Cited by 885Leaf Properties and Growth MeasurementRemote Sensing in AgriculturePhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings

Uddling, J., Gelang-Alfredsson, J., Piikki, K., Pleijel, H.·2007·Photosynthesis Research

Abstract

Relationships between chlorophyll concentration ([chl]) and SPAD values were determined for birch, wheat, and potato. For all three species, the relationships were non-linear with an increasing slope with increasing SPAD. The relationships for birch and wheat were strong (r (2) approximately 0.9), while the potato relationship was comparatively weak (r (2) approximately 0.5). Birch and wheat had very similar relationships when the chlorophyll concentration was expressed per unit leaf area, but diverged when it was expressed per unit fresh weight. Furthermore, wheat showed similar SPAD-[chl] relationships for two different cultivars and during two different growing seasons. The curvilinear shape of the SPAD-[chl] relationships agreed well with the simulated effects of non-uniform chlorophyll distribution across the leaf surface and multiple scattering, causing deviations from linearity in the high and low SPAD range, respectively. The effect of non-uniformly distributed chlorophyll is likely to be more important in explaining the non-linearity in the empirical relationships, since the effect of scattering was predicted to be comparatively weak. The simulations were based on the algorithm for the calculation of SPAD-502 output values. We suggest that SPAD calibration curves should generally be parameterised as non-linear equations, and we hope that the relationships between [chl] and SPAD and the simulations of the present study can facilitate the interpretation of chlorophyll…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11120-006-9077-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SPAD meter is used for rapid, accurate, and nondestructive chlorophyll concentration determination by measuring the difference between red (650 nm) and infrared (940 nm) light through the leaf.

    “This handheld device is used for rapid, accurate, and nondestructive chlorophyll concentration determination by measuring the difference between a red (650 nm) and an infrared (940 nm) light through the leaf generating the SPAD values (Uddling et al. 2007).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uddling, J., Gelang-Alfredsson, J., Piikki, K., & Pleijel, H.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Uddling, J.
Venue
Photosynthesis Research
Published
2007-03-07
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
37-46
ISSN
  • 0166-8595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5079
OpenAlex
W2115436074
Cited by
885
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
18.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photosynthesis Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
leaf chlorophyll content, birch, wheat, potato, multiple scattering, leaf optical properties, cultivar differences, growing season variation
MeSH terms
Chlorophyll, Solanum tuberosum, Spectrophotometry, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Triticum, Plant Leaves, Betula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review