Cited by 61Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsCommunity Health and DevelopmentCultural Competency in Health Care

American Indian cultures: how CBPR illuminated intertribal cultural elements fundamental to an adaptation effort

Open access
Jumper-Reeves, Leslie, Dustman, Patricia Allen, Harthun, Mary L., Kulis, Stephen, Brown, Eddie F.·2014·Prevention Science

Abstract

The ever-increasing numbers of ethnic minority populations in the USA seeking social services suggest that a "multicultural paradigm shift" is underway and gaining speed. This shift will increasingly demand that prevention programs and interventions be more culturally responsive. Interventions that are not aligned with prospective participants' world views and experiences are only minimally effective. Existing models for conducting culturally grounded program adaptations emphasize identifying distinct levels of cultural influences while preserving core elements of the original intervention. An effective adaptation requires competent language translation as well as trained translations of program concepts and principles that will be meaningful to the targeted group, without compromising program fidelity. This article describes how a university research team and curriculum developers worked with American Indian youth and adults in a large southwestern city using a CBPR process to identify cultural elements that became foundational to the adaptation of a prevention curriculum that is a national model program, with the objective of increasing its applicability for urban native youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-012-0361-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This suggested approach aligns with Jumper-Reeves et al.'s (2014) cultural adaptation framework, emphasizing the need for systematic documentation and evaluation of adaptation processes.

    “This suggested approach aligns with Jumper-Reeves et al.’s (2014) cultural adaptation framework, emphasizing the need for systematic documentation and evaluation of adaptation processes.”

    From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Jumper-Reeves et al., 2014

    The Abstract describes a systematic cultural adaptation, and “CBPR: an Iterative Process” describes repeated coding and comparison of participants’ accounts. These support a structured adaptation process, but the passages do not establish a framework calling for systematic documentation and evaluation of adaptation processes. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although a cultural adaptation framework for Indigenous prevention has been developed, follow-up studies documenting systematic implementation of this approach are sparse.

    “Although a cultural adaptation framework for Indigenous prevention has been developed (Jumper-Reeves et al., 2014), follow-up studies documenting systematic implementation of this approach are sparse.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 61

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Harthun M Dustman PA Jumper-Reeves L Hecht ML Marsiglia FF Using community-based participatory research to adapt kiR Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education 2009 53 12 38 21057596 PMC2971695
  2. Lobo S Peters K The urban experience of American Indians 2001 Alta Mira Press Walnut Creek, CA
  3. Mail PD Hawkins EH Radin S La Marr CJ Blume AW Chan KK Larimer M Chastain C Goines MA Insights from urban Indian teens on staying healthy: Data from focus groups American Journal of Health Studies 1 1 2005 99 105 2005 Winter/Spring
  4. Resnicow K Soler R Braithwaite R Ahluwalia J Butler J Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention Journal of Community Psychology 2000 28 271 290

Authors
Jumper-Reeves, L., Dustman, P. A., Harthun, M. L., Kulis, S., & Brown, E. F.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2013-02-15
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
547-556
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2014291521
Cited by
61
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD006110, P20MD002316)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
Keywords
community-based participatory research, Native American culture, culturally sensitive interventions, prevention curriculum, implementation fidelity, language translation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cultural Characteristics, Humans, Indians, North American, Southwestern United States, Focus Groups, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review