American Indian cultures: how CBPR illuminated intertribal cultural elements fundamental to an adaptation effort
Open accessAbstract
The ever-increasing numbers of ethnic minority populations in the USA seeking social services suggest that a "multicultural paradigm shift" is underway and gaining speed. This shift will increasingly demand that prevention programs and interventions be more culturally responsive. Interventions that are not aligned with prospective participants' world views and experiences are only minimally effective. Existing models for conducting culturally grounded program adaptations emphasize identifying distinct levels of cultural influences while preserving core elements of the original intervention. An effective adaptation requires competent language translation as well as trained translations of program concepts and principles that will be meaningful to the targeted group, without compromising program fidelity. This article describes how a university research team and curriculum developers worked with American Indian youth and adults in a large southwestern city using a CBPR process to identify cultural elements that became foundational to the adaptation of a prevention curriculum that is a national model program, with the objective of increasing its applicability for urban native youth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This suggested approach aligns with Jumper-Reeves et al.'s (2014) cultural adaptation framework, emphasizing the need for systematic documentation and evaluation of adaptation processes.
“This suggested approach aligns with Jumper-Reeves et al.’s (2014) cultural adaptation framework, emphasizing the need for systematic documentation and evaluation of adaptation processes.”
From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Jumper-Reeves et al., 2014
The Abstract describes a systematic cultural adaptation, and “CBPR: an Iterative Process” describes repeated coding and comparison of participants’ accounts. These support a structured adaptation process, but the passages do not establish a framework calling for systematic documentation and evaluation of adaptation processes. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAlthough a cultural adaptation framework for Indigenous prevention has been developed, follow-up studies documenting systematic implementation of this approach are sparse.
“Although a cultural adaptation framework for Indigenous prevention has been developed (Jumper-Reeves et al., 2014), follow-up studies documenting systematic implementation of this approach are sparse.”
From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Jumper-Reeves et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Harthun M Dustman PA Jumper-Reeves L Hecht ML Marsiglia FF Using community-based participatory research to adapt kiR Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education 2009 53 12 38 21057596 PMC2971695
- Lobo S Peters K The urban experience of American Indians 2001 Alta Mira Press Walnut Creek, CA
- Mail PD Hawkins EH Radin S La Marr CJ Blume AW Chan KK Larimer M Chastain C Goines MA Insights from urban Indian teens on staying healthy: Data from focus groups American Journal of Health Studies 1 1 2005 99 105 2005 Winter/Spring
- Resnicow K Soler R Braithwaite R Ahluwalia J Butler J Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention Journal of Community Psychology 2000 28 271 290
- Authors
- Jumper-Reeves, L., Dustman, P. A., Harthun, M. L., Kulis, S., & Brown, E. F.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Kulis, Stephen
- Venue
- Prevention Science
- Published
- 2013-02-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-556
- ISSN
- 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6695
- PMC
- PMC3726553
- OpenAlex
- W2014291521
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD006110, P20MD002316)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- community-based participatory research, Native American culture, culturally sensitive interventions, prevention curriculum, implementation fidelity, language translation
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Cultural Characteristics, Humans, Indians, North American, Southwestern United States, Focus Groups, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review