Cited by 30Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Oxytocin Receptor Gene Variant Interacts with Intervention Delivery Format in Predicting Intervention Outcomes for Youth with Conduct Problems

Open access
Glenn, Andrea L., Lochman, John E., Dishion, Thomas, Powell, Nicole P., Boxmeyer, Caroline, Qu, Lixin·2018·Prevention Science

Abstract

Coping Power is an evidence-based preventive intervention program for youth with aggressive behavior problems that has traditionally been delivered in small group formats. Because of concerns about iatrogenic effects secondary to aggregation of high risk youth, the current study examined whether genetic risk may moderate intervention outcome when youth were randomly assigned to group versus individual formats of an intervention. The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) has been associated with social behavior and may influence susceptibility to social reinforcement in general and deviant peer influence in particular. One variant of OXTR (rs2268493) was examined in 197 fourth-grade African-American children (64% male) who were randomly assigned to Group Coping Power or Individual Coping Power (Lochman et al. 2015). Longitudinal assessments of teacher- and parent-reported behavior were collected through a 1-year follow-up. Growth curve analyses revealed a genotype by delivery format interaction. Youth with the A/A genotype demonstrated reductions in externalizing problems over the course of the intervention regardless of intervention format. In contrast, carriers of the G allele receiving the group-based intervention showed little improvement during the intervention and a worsening of symptoms during the follow-up year, while those receiving the individual format demonstrated reductions in externalizing problems. Given the associations between this OXTR variant and social bonding, carriers of the G allele may be more sensitive to social rewards from deviant peers in the group setting. This study suggests that genetic factors may be useful in predicting which type of intervention will be most effective for a particular individual.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-017-0777-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • G-allele carriers in group-based intervention showed little improvement during the intervention and a worsening of symptoms during the follow-up year, while those receiving the individual format demonstrated reductions in externalizing problems.

    “G-allele carriers in group-based intervention showed little improvement during the intervention and aworsening of symptoms during the follow-up year, while those receiving the individual formatdemonstrated reductions in externalizing problems.”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Glenn [108]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A/A genotype demonstrated reductions in externalizing problems regardless of intervention format.

    “A/A genotype demonstrated reductions in externalizing problems regardless of intervention format.”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Glenn [108]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 30

Authors
Glenn, A. L., Lochman, J. E., Dishion, T., Powell, N. P., Boxmeyer, C., & Qu, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Glenn, Andrea L.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2017-03-16
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
38-48
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2596967644
Cited by
30
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01 DA023156)
  • NIH (R01 HD079273)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
oxytocin receptor gene, gene-environment interaction, intervention delivery format, group versus individual intervention, aggression, conduct problems, externalizing problems, deviant peer influence, social reinforcement, African American children, preventive interventions, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Aggression, Child, Female, Forecasting, Genotype, Humans, Male, Preventive Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Receptors, Oxytocin, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review