Cited by 104Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSeed and Plant BiochemistrySodium Intake and Health

Chia Flour Supplementation Reduces Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Subjects

Toscano, Luciana Tavares, da Silva, Cássia Surama Oliveira, Toscano, Lydiane Tavares, de Almeida, Antônio Eduardo Monteiro, da Cruz Santos, Amilton, Silva, Alexandre Sérgio·2014·Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chia supplementation (Salvia hispanica L.) on blood pressure (BP) and its associated cardiometabolic factors in treated and untreated hypertensive individuals. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: the hypertensive-drug treated (CHIA-MD, n = 10), hypertensive untreated (CHIA-NM, n = 9) and placebo (PLA-MD, n = 7) groups. The subjects consumed 35 g/day of either chia flour or a placebo for 12 weeks. The clinical and ambulatory BP, inflammation, oxidative stress and markers for nitric oxide were measured. While the PLA-MD group showed no changes in BP, there was a reduction in the mean clinical blood pressure (MBP) in the CHIA (111.5 ± 1.9 to 102.7 ± 1.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) and CHIA-MD (111.3 ± 2.2 to 100.1 ± 1.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) groups. The CHIA-NM group showed no reduction in the MBP but did show a decreased systolic BP (146.8 ± 3.8 to 137.3 ± 3.1 mmHg, p < 0.05). The clinical BP reduction was demonstrated by a 24 h ambulatory systolic reduction in all of the supplemented groups. However, the mean ambulatory BP was reduced only in the CHIA (98.1 ± 2.4 to 92.8 ± 2.2 mmHg, p < 0.05) group, and there was no change in the diastolic component in either of the CHIA groups. The lipid peroxidation was reduced in the CHIA (p = 0.04) and CHIA-NM (p = 0.02) groups compared with the PLA-MD group. A reduction in the plasma nitrite levels was observed only in the CHIA group (p = 0.02). Chia flour has the ability to reduce ambulatory and clinical BP in both treated and untreated hypertensive individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11130-014-0452-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 104

Authors
Toscano, L. T., da Silva, C. S. O., Toscano, L. T., de Almeida, A. E. M., da Cruz Santos, A., & Silva, A. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR)
Corresponding author
Silva, Alexandre Sérgio
Venue
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
Published
2014-11-18
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
392-398
ISSN
  • 0033-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 0921-9668
  • 1573-9104
OpenAlex
W2022666405
Cited by
104
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
chia flour, Salvia hispanica, hypertension, blood pressure reduction, ambulatory blood pressure, lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, inflammation, nitric oxide, plasma nitrite, cardiometabolic risk factors, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Female, Flour, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Nitrites, Seeds, Lipid Peroxidation, Biomarkers, Oxidative Stress, Dietary Supplements, Salvia, Plant Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review