The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, previous studies re ported significant differences in SMU (e.g., number and characteristics of friends, frequency and time spent on SMU) and personal factors related to SMU (e.g., self-disclosure, motivation for SMU, personality traits, loneliness, and shyness) by countries (Cho and Park, 2013; Jackson and Wang, 2013; Kalia et al., 2019).”
From Social media use, mental health and sleep: A systematic review with meta-analyses (2024) · cites this paper as Cho and Park, 2013
Citations
Cites
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x · Cited by 732
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Altman I., Taylor D.: Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NewYork (1983)
- Barnett G.A.: Communication and the evolution of SNS: cultural convergence perspective. J. Contemp. Eastern Asia 10(1), 43–54 (2011) · DOI
- Chen G.M.: Differences in self-disclosure patterns among Americans versus Chinese. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 26, 84–91 (1995) · DOI
- Cho, S.E.: Cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American social network sites: exploring cultural differences in social relationships and self-presentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Program in Communication and Information Science. State University of New Jersey (2010)
- Cho C-H., Cheon H.J.: Cross-cultural comparisons of interactivity on corporate web sites: the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and South Korea. J. Advert. 34, 99–115 (2005) · DOI
- Donath J., Body D.: Public displays of connection. BT Technol. J. 22, 71–82 (2004) · DOI · Paper page
- Hofstede G.H.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2001)
- Kim H., Coyle J.R., Gould S.J.: Collectivist and individualist influences on website design in South Korea and the U.S.: a cross-cultural content analysis. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 14, 581–601 (2009) · DOI
- Kim H., Papacharissi Z.: Cross-cultural differences in online self-presentation: a content analysis of personal Korean and US home pages. Asian J. Commun. 13, 100–119 (2003) · DOI
- Kleck, C.A., Reese, C.A., Behnken, D.Z., Sundar, S.S.: The company you keep and the image you project: putting your best face forward in online social networks. Paper to be presented at the annual conference of the international communication association (ICA), San Francisco, USA, May 2007
- Leech N.L., Onwuegbuzie A.J.: A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual. Quant. 43, 265–275 (2009) · DOI
- Ma R.: Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In: Herring, S.C. (eds) Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, pp. 173–185. John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam (1996) · DOI
- Merton R.K., Kendall P.L.: The focused interview. Am. J. Sociol. 51, 541–557 (1946) · DOI
- Miller K., Mont D., Maitland A., Altman B., Madans J.: Results of a cross-national structured cognitive interviewing protocol to test measures of disability. Qual. Quant. 45, 801–815 (2011) · DOI
- Ozel, B., Park, H.W.: Online image content analysis of political figures: an exploratory study. Qual. Quant. (2012). doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9445-x · DOI
- Park H.W.: Examining academic Internet use using a combined method. Qual. Quant. 46, 251–266 (2012) · DOI
- Park H.W., Lee Y.: The Korean presidential election of 2007: five years on from the “Internet Election”. J. Contemp. Eastern Asia 7(1), 1–4 (2008) · DOI
- Park H.W., Thelwall M.: Link analysis: hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ web sites in South Korea. Qual. Quant. 42, 687–697 (2008) · DOI
- Petronio S.: The boundaries of privacy: praxis of everyday life. In: Petronio, S. (eds) Balancing the Secrets of Private Disclosures, pp. 37–49. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)
- Rist R.C.: On the relations among educational research paradigms: from disdain to détente. In: Bryman, A. (eds) Mixed Methods, vol. 1, pp. 145–162. Sage, London (2006)
- Seitz A.: The political dimension of intercultural research-the Australian experience. Qual. Quant. 27, 411–420 (1993) · DOI
- Ting-Toomey S.: Intercultural conflict styles: a face-negotiation theory. In: Kim, Y.Y., Gudykunst, W.B. (eds) Theories in Intercultural Communication, pp. 213–235. Sage, London (1988)
- Trubishky P., Ting-Toomey S., Lin S.-L.: The influence of individualism-collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 15, 65–84 (1991) · DOI
- Yum J.O.: The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Commun. Monogr. 55, 374–388 (1988) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social media use, mental health and sleep: A systematic review with meta-analyses
Ahmed, O., Walsh, E. I., Dawel, A., Alateeq, K., Espinoza Oyarce, D. A., & Cherbuin, N. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.193 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, S. E., & Park, H. W.
- Affiliations
- Yeungnam University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Park, Han Woo
- Venue
- Quality & Quantity
- Published
- 2012-01-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2319-2330
- ISSN
- 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7845
- OpenAlex
- W1987947362
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality & Quantity (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- social network sites, cross-cultural comparison, self-disclosure, online relationships, online communication behavior, Korean users, cultural differences in communication, attitudes toward social media, new media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11135-011-9658-z
- The paper
- Cho, S. E., & Park, H. W. (2013). A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9658-z