Unspeaking on Facebook? Testing network effects on self-censorship of political expressions in social network sites
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Mutz, D. C. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088437 · Cited by 1,265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Instead, the significant diversity effect is in line with existing arguments that exposure to diverse political views within political discussion networks does not necessarily enhance political communication activities (Eveland and Hively 2009; Knoke 1990; Mutz 2002).”
ResultEcho chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Garrett, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516719 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Matthes, J., Knoll, J., & von Sikorski, C. (2018) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650217745429 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kwon, K. H., Moon, S.-I., & Stefanone, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Myongji University (KR)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moon, Shin-Il
- ORCID
- Kwon, K. Hazel
- Venue
- Quality & Quantity
- Published
- 2014-07-23
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1417-1435
- ISSN
- 0033-5177 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7845
- OpenAlex
- W2167455250
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality & Quantity (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Keywords
- self-censorship, political expression, spiral of silence, social network sites, network effects, fear of isolation, privacy, conformity, informational influence, normative influence, Facebook
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
