Cited by 45Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Cancer survivorship and care

Subjective quality of life in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Rakib, A., White, P. D., Pinching, A. J., Hedge, B., Newbery, N., Fakhoury, W. K., Priebe, S.·2005·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to (1) assess Subjective Quality of Life (SQOL) of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) using a generic concept and to compare the findings with those in groups with mental disorders and healthy subjects, and (2) investigate whether and, if so, to what extent socio-demographic and clinical variables predict SQOL in CFS patients. Seventy-three patients diagnosed with CFS were randomly selected and interviewed from two specialised clinics. CFS was diagnosed using the Oxford Criteria. SQOL was assessed on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) on the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 (MOS) SF-36. A battery of mood and symptom questionnaires, including the Symptom Checklist Questionnaire (SCL-90-R), was administered to assess various aspects of symptomatology as potential predictor variables. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of SQOL. Overall, SQOL was low in CFS patients and less favourable than in groups with mental disorders and healthy subjects. Satisfaction was particularly low with life as a whole, leisure activities and financial situation. Whilst SQOL was only moderately correlated with HRQOL, the SCL-90-R score, especially SCL-90-R Depression scale score, was the best predictor of SQOL explaining 35% of the variance. HRQOL and generic SQOL appear distinct despite some overlap. The findings underline that SQOL is significantly disrupted in CFS patients. Depressive symptoms are statistically the strongest 'predictor' of SQOL, although the direction of the relationship is not established. These data suggest that treatment of depression associated with CFS, regardless of causation, could help to improve SQOL in CFS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-004-1693-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 45

Authors
Rakib, A., White, P. D., Pinching, A. J., Hedge, B., Newbery, N., Fakhoury, W. K., & Priebe, S.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Priebe, S.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2005-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
11-19
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2116988839
Cited by
45
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, subjective quality of life, health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms, predictors of quality of life, sociodemographic factors, SF-36, Mansa, SCL-90-R
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review