Cited by 89Aging, Health, and DisabilityMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Patterns of pain and mobility limitation in older people: cross-sectional findings from a population survey of 18,497 adults aged 50 years and over

Mottram, Sara, Peat, George, Thomas, Elaine, Wilkie, Ross, Croft, Peter·2008·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Mobility limitation is the most common disability in the general population, and pain is a frequent symptom at older ages. We have investigated the association of different patterns of pain and mobility limitation in a large sample of older adults. A cross-sectional postal survey of all adults aged 50 years and over registered with eight general practices in North Staffordshire, UK, resulted in 18,497 respondents (adjusted response=70.8%). Information on demographics, recent pain and the self-reported level of mobility limitation was collected. Associations between pain and mobility limitation were assessed using a partial proportional odds model, taking into account age, gender and socio-economic status. Limitation in walking 100 yards was reported by 29% of respondents. Limitation increased sharply with age, and was higher in the female and lower socio-economic groups. Persons reporting pain were significantly more likely to report limitation. The relationship between mobility limitation and pain was stronger in the youngest age group, but proportionally more people in the oldest age groups have mobility limitation associated with pain. Lower limb and multiple pains present a potential target for the prevention of mobility limitation up to the oldest age groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-008-9324-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mottram, S., Peat, G., Thomas, E., Wilkie, R., & Croft, P.
Affiliations
Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mottram, Sara
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2008-03-26
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
529-539
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2076331712
Cited by
89
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E500579/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
pain, mobility limitations, older adults, walking distance, age differences, sex differences, socioeconomic status, lower limb pain, disability, general practice population
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Models, Statistical, Odds Ratio, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review