Association of insomnia with quality of life, work productivity, and activity impairment
Abstract
Purpose To assess the association of insomnia with health-related quality of life (HRQOL), work productivity, and activity impairment.Methods Data were obtained from the 2005 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Subjects were assigned to the insomnia group (diagnosed insomnia experienced at least a few times a month) or the noninsomnia group (no insomnia or sleep symptoms). HRQOL was assessed using the short form 8 (SF-8) (mental and physical scores). The work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI) assessed absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work), work productivity loss (overall work impairment), and activity impairment. Linear regression models were used to control for potential confounders.Results A total of 19,711 adults were evaluated (5,161 insomnia, 14,550 noninsomnia). Subjects in the insomnia group had significantly lower SF-8 physical (-5.40) and mental (-4.39) scores and greater activity impairment scores (+18.04) than subjects in the noninsomnia group (P < 0.01 for all). Employed subjects in the insomnia group had greater absenteeism (+6.27), presenteeism (+13.20), and work productivity loss (+10.33) scores than those in the noninsomnia group (P < 0.01 for all).Conclusions Insomnia is significantly associated with poorer physical and mental quality of life and work productivity loss and activity impairment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insomnia is a common problem among cancer patients, potentially devastatingly impacting their quality of life.
“Insomnia is a common problem among cancer patients, potentially devastatingly impacting their quality of life [81,82,83,84].”
From The Effect of Vinyasa Yoga Practice on the Well-Being of Breast-Cancer Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [84]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 248
- Authors
- Bolge, S. C., Doan, J. F., Kannan, H., & Baran, R. W.
- Affiliations
- Takeda (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bolge, Susan C.
- ORCID
- Baran, Robert W.
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2009-03-14
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 415-422
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2083964453
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Keywords
- insomnia, health-related quality of life, labor productivity, activity impairment, absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, physical function, mental health, sleep disorders
- MeSH terms
- Absenteeism, Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Disability Evaluation, Efficiency, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, United States, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review