The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey
Abstract
Objective Evaluate the reliability and validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form version 2 (SF-12v2) in the 2003-2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).Research design Data were collected in the self-administered mail-out questionnaire and face-to-face interviews of the MEPS (n = 20,661). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability and construct, discriminate, predictive and concurrent validity were tested. The EQ-5D, perceived health and mental health questions were used to test construct and discriminate validity. Self-reported work, physical and cognitive limits tested predictive validity and number of chronic conditions assessed concurrent validity.Results Both Mental Component Summary Scores (MCS) and Physical Component Summary Scores (PCS) were shown to have high internal consistency reliability (alpha > .80). PCS showed high test-retest reliability (ICC = .78) while MCS demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC = .60). PCS had high convergent validity for EQ-5D items (except self-care) and physical health status (r > .56). MCS demonstrated moderate convergent validity on EQ-5D and mental health items (r > .38). PCS distinguish between groups with different physical and work limitations. Similarly, MCS distinguished between groups with and without cognitive limitations. The MCS and PCS showed perfect dose response when variations in scores were examined by participant's chronic condition status.Conclusions Both component scores showed adequate reliability and validity with the 2003-2004 MEPS and should be suitable for use in a variety of proposes within this database.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“a CBT intervention was also effective in improving quality of life in a small RCT from Hong Kong [42]”
From A prospective service evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This finding is concordant with existing evidence from a small number of controlled studies of cognitive behavioural therapy and ACT for epilepsy.”
From A prospective service evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
EuroQol: the current state of play
Brooks, R. (1996) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6 · Cited by 5,815
Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00045-3 · Cited by 2,228 · cited 1×
“... patients may experience a response shift, a concept from the quality of life field, defined as ‘‘a change in one’s evaluation of quality of life as a result of: (a) a redefinition of the target construct (i.e., reconceptualization), (b) a change in values (i.e., the importance of component domains constituting the…”
BackgroundGrant, B. F., Hasin, D. S., Stinson, F. S., Dawson, D. A., Chou, S. P., Ruan, W. J., & Pickering, R. P. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v65n0711 · Cited by 724
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Turner-Bowker, D., & Gandek, B. (2002). SF12v2: How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualiyMetric Incorporated.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kale, H. P., & Carroll, N. V. (2016) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.29808 · Cited by 362
Montazeri, A., Vahdaninia, M., Mousavi, S. J., & Omidvari, S. (2009) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-341 · Cited by 358
Pulmonary Function and Radiologic Features in Survivors of Critical COVID-19
González, J., Benitez, I. D., Carmona, P., Santisteve, S., Monge, A., Moncusí‐Moix, A., Gort‐Paniello, C., Pinilla, L., Carratalá, A., Zuil, M., et al. (2021) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.062 · Cited by 275
Huo, T., Guo, Y. M., Shenkman, E. A., & Muller, K. E. (2018) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0858-2 · Cited by 252
Wayne, N., Perez, D. F., Kaplan, D. M., & Ritvo, P. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4871 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheak-Zamora, N. C., Wyrwich, K. W., & McBride, T. D.
- Affiliations
- United BioSource Corporation (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2009-05-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 727-735
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2073794479
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- SF-12v2, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, health-related quality of life, reliability statistics, validity, construct validity, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, EQ-5D, chronic disease, work limitations, cognitive limitations, physical limitations, mental component summary, physical component summary
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Health Expenditures, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
