Daily activities mediate the relationship between personality and quality of life in middle-aged women
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to test a model proposing that the relationship between personality factors and women's quality of life (QoL) is mediated by degree of depression and the way in which every day activity and general health were appraised. Specifically, the paper addressed the mediating contribution of activity.Methods A sample of 488 women, 38 or 50 years old, filled out questionnaires regarding the target variables. The personality traits measured were extraversion and neuroticism, and the activity aspect addressed was the value linked with everyday activities. Additionally, general health and depressive state was rated. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data.Results A model was found where health, activity and depressive state mediated the association between personality and QoL. Health explained in total nearly 30% of the variation in QoL. Activity predicted 12% of the variance in QoL, partly as a unique factor and partly mediated by depressive state and health. Extraversion was linked to QoL only through activity, and neuroticism through depressive state and health.Conclusions Our analysis supported that there was a link between personality and QoL and that perceived general health was an important contributor to QoL. Moreover, it contributed new knowledge regarding the importance of valued and satisfying activities. If this proves to be a consistent finding in future studies, including intervention research, monitoring women's daily activities might be a pathway to improved QoL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety is related to negative ratings of subjective well-being factors such as quality of life.
“Research indicates that a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety is related to negative ratings of subjective well-being factors such as quality of life [29, 30].”
From Exploring mediators of the recovery process over time among mental health service users, using a mixed model regression analysis based on cluster RCT data (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Eklund, M., Bäckström, M., Lissner, L., Björkelund, C., & Sonn, U.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Eklund, Mona
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2010-07-17
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1477-1486
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2034461827
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lup.lub.lu.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
- Keywords
- quality of life, personality, extraversion, neuroticism, daily activities, general health perception, depressive state, middle-aged women, mediation, valued activities
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depressive Disorder, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Neurotic Disorders, Personality, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Cohort Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review