Deriving population norms for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D multi-attribute utility instruments from web-based data
Abstract
Objectives (i) to demonstrate a method which ameliorates the problem of self-selection in the estimation of population norms from web-based data and (ii) to use the method to calculate population norms for two multi-attribute utility (MAU) instruments, the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D, and population norms for the sub-scales from which they are constructed.Methods A web-based survey administered the AQoL-8D MAU instrument (which subsumes the AQoL-6D questionnaire), to members of the public along with the AQoL-4D which has extant population norms. Age, gender and the AQoL-4D were used as post-stratification auxiliary variables to construct weights to ameliorate the potential effects of self-selection associated with web-based surveys. The weights were used to estimate unbiased population norms. Standard errors from the weighted samples were calculated using Jackknife estimation.Results For both AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D, physical health dimensions decline significantly with age. In contrast, for the majority of the psycho-social dimensions there is a significant U-shaped profile. The net effect is a shallow U-shaped relationship between age and both the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D utilities. This contrasts with the almost monotonic decline in the utilities derived from the AQoL-4D and SF-6D MAU instruments.Conclusions Post-stratification weights were used to ameliorate potential bias in the derivation of norms from web-based data for the AQoL-6D and AQoL-8D. The methods may be used generally to obtain norms when suitable auxiliary variables are available. The inclusion of an enlarged psycho-social component in the two instruments significantly alters the demographic profile.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AQoL-8D is characterized by a high Cronbach's Alpha of 0.96 and good psychometric properties.
“The AQoL-8D is characterized by a high Cronbach's Alpha of 0.96 and good psychometric properties (58).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Maxwell, A., Özmen, M., Iezzi, A., & Richardson, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Richardson, Jeff
- Venue
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2016-06-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3209-3219
- ISSN
- 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2649
- OpenAlex
- W2462498193
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1006334)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- AQoL-8D, population norms, multi-attribute utility, online surveys, self-selection bias, SF-6D, health-related quality of life measurement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review