The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment
Open accessAbstract
SFAS 142 requires managers to estimate the current fair value of goodwill to determine goodwill write-offs. In promulgating the standard, the FASB predicted that managers will, on average, use the fair-value estimates to convey private information on future cash flows. The current fair value of goodwill is unverifiable because it depends in part on management’s future actions (including managers’ conceptualization and implementation of firm strategy). Agency theory predicts managers will, on average, use the unverifiable discretion in SFAS 142 consistent with private incentives. We test these hypotheses in a sample of firms with market indications of goodwill impairment. Our evidence, while consistent with some agency-theory based predictions, does not confirm the private information hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x09351676 · Cited by 5,774
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296 · Cited by 1,961
Cited by
Man versus machine: Complex estimates and auditor reliance on artificial intelligence
COMMERFORD, B. P., DENNIS, S. A., JOE, J. R., & ULLA, J. W. (2022) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12407 · Cited by 270
Jahan, N., & Karim, M. S. (2024) · Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-2022-129 · Cited by 19
Elmahgoub, M., Smith, J. A., Elamer, A. A., & Abdelfattah, T. (2025) · International Journal of Accounting & Information Management · doi:10.1108/ijaim-11-2024-0441 · Cited by 7
Expanded audit report and the value relevance of goodwill impairment
Elmahgoub, M., Smith, J. A., Elamer, A. A., & Abdelfattah, T. (2026) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1108/jal-01-2025-0041 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramanna, K., & Watts, R. L.
- Venue
- Review of Accounting Studies
- Published
- 2012-05-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 749-780
- ISSN
- 1380-6653 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7136
- OpenAlex
- W2101911498
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 132.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.