Cited by 201Literacy and Educational PracticesReading and Literacy DevelopmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Exploring the relationship between adolescent’s reading skills, reading motivation and reading habits

Open access
McGeown, Sarah P., Duncan, Lynne G., Griffiths, Yvonne M., Stothard, Sue E.·2015·Reading and Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11145-014-9537-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been rather less research on how reading different text types is associated with young people's reading skills.

    “Yet there has been rather less research on how reading different text typesfor instance the frequency with which young people read fiction books compared to nonfiction books -is associated with young people's reading skills (McGeown et al, 2015;Sullivan, 2015).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 201

Authors
McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
McGeown, Sarah P.
Venue
Reading and Writing
Published
2014-12-10
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
545-569
ISSN
  • 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0905
OpenAlex
W2120861156
Cited by
201
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
35.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Reading and Writing (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
adolescent reading, reading motivation, reading habits, reading comprehension, word reading, reading speed, gender differences, age differences, reading skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review