The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Efficiency losses from overlapping regulation of EU carbon emissions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 123
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Betz R., Eichhammer W., Schleich J. (2004). Designing national allocation plans for EU emissions trading—a first analysis of the outcome. Energy and Environment 15(3): 375–423 · DOI
- Böhringer C. (2002). Industry-level emission trading between power producers in the EU. Applied Economics 34(4): 523–533 · DOI
- Böhringer C., Lange A. (2005). Mission impossible!?—on the harmonization of national allocation plans under the EU emissions trading directive. Journal of Regulatory Economics 27(1): 51–71 · DOI
- Böhringer C., Hoffmann T., Lange A., Löschel A., Moslener U. (2005). Assessing emission allocation in Europe: An interactive simulation approach. The Energy Journal 26(4): 1–22 · DOI
- Bovenberg A.L. (1999). Green tax reforms and the double dividend: An updated reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance 6(3): 421–443 · DOI
- Brooke A., Kendrick D., Meeraus A. (1987). GAMS: A user’s guide. South San Francisco, Scientific Press
- Criqui P., Mima S. (2001). The European greenhouse gas tradable emission permit system: Some policy issues identified with the POLES-ASPEN Model. ENER Bulletin 23: 51–55
- Ekins P. (1996). The secondary benefits of CO2 abatement: How much emission reduction do they really justify?. Ecological Economics 16(1): 13–24 · DOI
- EU (2003a). Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003, Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 275/32, Brussels.
- EU (2003b). Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003, Restructuring the Community Framework for the Taxation of Energy Products and Electricity. Official Journal of the European Union L 283/51, Brussels.
- Goulder L.H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance 2: 157–183 · DOI
- Klepper G., Peterson S. (2006). On the robustness of marginal abatement cost curves: The influence of world energy prices. Resource and Energy Economics 28(1): 1–23
- Point Carbon (2006). Carbon 2006. H. Hasselknippe & K. RØine (Eds.).
- Sorrell S., Sijm J. (2003). Carbon trading in the policy mix. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19(3): 420–437 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Böhringer, C., Koschel, H., & Moslener, U.
- Affiliations
- Centre for European Economic Research (DE)
- ORCID
- Moslener, Ulf
- Venue
- Journal of Regulatory Economics
- Published
- 2007-11-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-317
- ISSN
- 0922-680X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2098707068
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Regulatory Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Keywords
- EU Emissions Trading System, pollution taxes, overlapping regulations, excess costs, compliance costs, climate policy, EU member states, sectoral regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
