The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the effectiveness of environmental offset policies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the difficulty of proving additionality , or that the carbon-reducing activity would not have happened regardless of investment or purchase of the offset [17, 46]”
From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
Pigou, A. C. (1933) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2224491 · Cited by 5,137
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Global Warming and Climate Change · doi:10.4135/9781412963893.n235 · Cited by 1,687
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
Tietenberg, T. H., & Lewis, L. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315523972 · Cited by 1,621
Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments
Stavins, R. N. (2003) · Handbook of Environmental Economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0099(03)01014-3 · Cited by 732
The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results
Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. K. (2007) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rem003 · Cited by 656
Environmental and Natural Resource Economics
Tietenberg, T. H., & LEWIS, L. Y. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003213734 · Cited by 563
Goulder, L. H., Parry, I. W. H., Williams III, R. C., & Burtraw, D. (1999) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(98)00109-1 · Cited by 528
Carbon Trading: A Review of the Kyoto Mechanisms
Hepburn, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141203 · Cited by 256
A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Offsets
Wara, M. W., & Victor, D. G. (2008) · Cited by 230
Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned
SCHNEIDER, L. (2009) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0533 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Breetz, H. L., Fisher-Vanden, K., Garson, L., Jacobs, H., Kroetz, K., & Terry, R. (2004). Water quality trading and offset initiatives in the US: A comprehensive survey. Hanover: Dartmouth College.
- Crocker, T. D. (1966). The economics of air pollution. In H. Wolozin (Ed.), The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.
Cited by
Luccioni, A. S., Strubell, E., & Crawford, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732007 · Cited by 71
“…difficulty of proving addi-tionality , or that the carbon-reducing activity would not have happened regardless of investment or purchase of the offset [17, 46], and (2) that offsetting rarely mitigates localizedimpacts tothe communities where emissions or other environmental degradation is occurring.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, R., & Richards, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Hahn, Robert
- ORCID
- Hahn, Robert
- Venue
- Journal of Regulatory Economics
- Published
- 2013-02-26
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-119
- ISSN
- 0922-680X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0468
- OpenAlex
- W2076054892
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Regulatory Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Keywords
- environmental offsets, pollution reduction, environmental regulation, ecosystem damage, political economy of regulation, institutional environment, environmental taxation, emissions trading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the effectiveness of environmental offset policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11149-013-9211-1
- The paper
- Hahn, R., & Richards, K. (2013). Understanding the effectiveness of environmental offset policies. Journal of Regulatory Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-013-9211-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
