CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Karl Barth and Christian TheologyStudy and Philosophy of ReligionPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

God’s omnipresence in the world: on possible meanings of ‘en’ in panentheism

Open access
Gasser, Georg·2019·International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
DOI 10.1007/s11153-018-9695-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Panenetheism is the claim that God and the cosmos are intimately inter-related, with the cosmos being in God and God being in the cosmos. What does this exactly mean? The aim of this paper is to address this question by sheding light on four possible models of God-world-inter-relatedness. Being critical of those models, which understand maximal immanence in a literal, spatial sense, the paper argues in favor of a model, which cashes out immanence in terms of divine activity. God is, where God acts. Since God acts upon all of creation everywhere and anytime, God is omnipresent to it at all times. Thus, the proposal is to read the ‘en’ in ‘panetheism’ in an ‘agential sense’: God is in the cosmos by creating and sustaining it and the cosmos is in God by constantly being within the sphere of divine activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11153-018-9695-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Arcadi, J. M. (2017). God is where god acts: Reconceiving divine omnipresence. Topoi, 36(4), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9377-0 . · DOI
  2. Baker, L. R. (2000). Persons and bodies. A constitution view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  3. Bracken, J. (2015). Panentheism and the classical god-world relationship: A systems-oriented approach. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, 36(3), 207–225. · DOI
  4. Brierley, M. W. (2004). Naming a quiet revolution. The panentheistic turn in modern theology. In P. Clayton & A. R. Peacocke (Eds.), In whom we live and move and have our being Panentheistic reflections on god’s presence in a scientific world (pp. 1–15). Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, MI.
  5. Clayton, P. (1997). God and contemporary science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  6. Clayton, P. (2017). How radically can god be reconceived before ceasing to be god? The four faces of panentheism. Zygon, 52(4), 1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12368 . · DOI
  7. Cross, R. (2016). Duns scotus on divine immensity. Faith and Philosophy, 33(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201610567 . · DOI
  8. Dalferth, I. U. (2006). Becoming present. An inquiry into the christian sense of the presence of god. Leuven: Peeters.
  9. Gordon, J. R. (2018). Rethinking divine spatiality: Divine omnipresence in philosophical and theological perspective. The Heythrop Journal, 59(3), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12832 . · DOI
  10. Henry, J., & McGuire, J. E. (2018). Voluntarism and panentheism: The sensorium of God and Isaac Newton’s theology. The Seventeenth Century, 33(5), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117x.2017.1340188 . · DOI
  11. Hudson, H. (2006). The metaphysics of hyperspace. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  12. Hudson, H. (2009). Omnipresence. In T. P. Flint & M. C. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology (pp. 199–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  13. Inman, R. D. (2017). Omnipresence and the location of the immaterial. In J. L. Kvanvig (Ed.), Oxford studies in philosophy of religion 8 (pp. 168–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Jedwab, J. (2016). God’s omnipresence: A defense of the classical view. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 8(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i2.61 . · DOI
  15. Kant, I. (1986). Lectures on philosophical theology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  16. Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  17. Lombard, P. (1971–1981). Sententiae (Vol. 2). Spicilegium Bonaventurianum, 4. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.
  18. Nerlich, G. (2010). The shape of space (2nd ed.). Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Newton, I. (1962). In A. R. Hall & M. Boas Hall (Eds.), Unpublished scientific papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Oakes, R. (2006). Divine omnipresence and maximal immanence: Supernaturalism versus pantheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 43(2), 171–179.
  21. Pasnau, R. (2011). On existing all at once. In C. Tapp & E. Runggaldier (Eds.), God, eternity, and time (pp. 11–29). Farnham: Ashgate.
  22. Stump, E. (2010). Wandering in darkness. Narrative and the problem of suffering. Oxford: Clarendon Press. · DOI
  23. Stump, E. (2013). Omnipresence, indwelling, and the second-personal. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5(4), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v5i4.204 . · DOI
  24. Swinburne, R. (1993). The coherence of theism (Rev ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. · DOI
  25. Wierenga, E. R. (2010). Omnipresence. In C. Taliaferro, P. Draper, & P. L. Quinn (Eds.), A companion to philosophy of religion (2nd ed., pp. 258–262). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Gasser, G.
Affiliations
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
Gasser, Georg
ORCID
Gasser, Georg
Venue
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
43-62
ISSN
  • 0020-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8684
DOI
10.1007/s11153-018-9695-9
OpenAlex
W2902869634
Cited by
53
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
18.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Library of the University of Innsbruck (University of Innsbruck) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (57397)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
panentheism, divine immanence, divine action, ontology of God

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: God’s omnipresence in the world: on possible meanings of ‘en’ in panentheism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11153-018-9695-9
The paper
Gasser, G. (2019). God’s omnipresence in the world: on possible meanings of ‘en’ in panentheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9695-9