The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rectifying Historical Territorial Injustices
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rather, they argue that settler colonialism is a distinctly territorial wrong with two inherent features: dispossession and political domination.”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Luoma and Moore, 2024
In the citing paper
“Instead, their prescriptions for a decolonized territorial world hinge on rectifying the ' persistent denial of [Indigenous political communities ' territorial] claims ' by settler states and appropriately compensating them for land that can no longer be returned (Luoma and Moore, 2024: 12).”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Luoma and Moore, 2024
In the citing paper
“On their view, settler colonialism in the Americas and Australasia is an historical injustice -land was taken and political authority imposed ' at some point in the past ' (Luoma and Moore, 2024: 2) -that remains unrectified in the present.”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Luoma and Moore, 2024
In the citing paper
“Although liberal theorists differ on whether Indigenous land theft has been superseded, they all insist that claims to ' huge amounts of land ' are unjustified due to present fairness constraints (Simmons, 2016: 131; see also Luoma and Moore, 2024; Moore, 2015: 141; 2016: 458; Stilz 2019a: 78 -84; 2019b.).”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Luoma and Moore, 2024
In the citing paper
“Territory theorists consider dispossession a serious injustice, often resulting in a group ' s loss of selfdetermination, forced removal, or confinement to smaller portions of their territory (Luoma and Moore, 2024: 2).”
From Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Luoma and Moore, 2024
Citations
Cites
Coulthard, G. S., & Alfred, T. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9781452942421 · Cited by 4,120
Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy
Shue, H. (1980) · Cited by 1,310
Superseding Historic Injustice
Waldron, J. (1992) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/293468 · Cited by 888
Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law
Burchill, R. (2005) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592705770158 · Cited by 565
A Political Theory of Territory
Moore, M. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190222246.001.0001 · Cited by 442
Self-citationTerritorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration
Stilz, A. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833536.001.0001 · Cited by 291
Miller, D. E. (2004) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/379353 · Cited by 186
Rectifying International Injustice: Principles of Compensation and Restitution Between Nations
Butt, D. (2009) · Cited by 184
Public Philosophy in a New Key
Tully, J. H. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790737 · Cited by 135
Simmons, A. J. (2016) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190603489.001.0001 · Cited by 107
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Alfred, Taiaiake. 2001. Deconstructing the British Columbia Treaty process. Balayi: Culture Law, and Colonialism 3: 37–65.
- Butt, Daniel. 2022. Settling claims for reparations. Journal of Race, Gender and Ethnicity 11 (1): 61–79.
- Coulthard, Glen S. 2014. Red skins white masks: rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. · DOI · Paper page
- Luoma, Michael. 2023. Negotiating our interdependence: A theory of political legitimacy and territorial decolonization. PhD Dissertation.
- Miller, David. 1995. On nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mills, Aaron. 2017. What is a treaty? On contract and mutual aid. In The right relationship: Reimagining the implementation of historical treaties, ed. John Borrows and Michael Coyle, 208–246. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Waldron, Jeremy. 2009. Proximity as the basis of political communities. Paper given to Workshop on Theories of Territory, King’s College, London, 21 February.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Borgogno, S. T. (2024) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-024-09693-9 · Cited by 4
Territorial justice as structural justice: settler colonialism and territorial rights theory
Jourdeuil, K. (2025) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2025.2528390 · Cited by 3
Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory
Jourdeuil, K. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423924000416 · Cited by 2
A presentist case for rectifying past territorial wrongs
Stilz, A. (2025) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2025.2528385 · Cited by 2
Group-differentiated rights for Indigenous communities that straddle borders
Luoma, M. (2024) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2024.2436264 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luoma, M., & Moore, M.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Moore, Margaret
- Venue
- Res Publica
- Published
- 2024-03-20
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 683-703
- ISSN
- 1356-4765 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8692
- OpenAlex
- W4392985436
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Res Publica (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences (341611)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- territorial rights, Indigenous land dispossession, indigenous political authority, self-determination (international law), distributive justice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rectifying Historical Territorial Injustices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11158-024-09660-4
- The paper
- Luoma, M., & Moore, M. (2024). Rectifying Historical Territorial Injustices. Res Publica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-024-09660-4
