Education in prison: A basic right and an essential tool
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A punitive orientation or a rehabilitative logic of incarceration determines whether and how to learn in prison, despite its specificity.
“orientation or a rehabilitative logic of incarceration determines whether and how to learn in prison, despite its specificity (Torrijo & De Maeyer, 2019).”
From Learning with digital technologies in prison: a scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as Torrijo & De Maeyer, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning with digital technologies in prison: a scoping review
Barros, R., Monteiro, A., & Leite, C. (2023) · Digital Education Review · doi:10.1344/der.2023.43.1-17 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The socio-political perspectives on LL (instrumental versus humanistic) underlie the difference between education and training in prison (Hopkins, 2015; Hopkins & Farley, 2014; Mertanen & Brunila, 2018; Torrijo & De Maeyer, 2019).”
Background
- Authors
- Rangel Torrijo, H., & De Maeyer, M.
- Venue
- International Review of Education
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 671-685
- ISSN
- 0020-8566 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0638
- OpenAlex
- W2982302781
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Review of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peace and Human Rights Education
- Keywords
- prison education, right to education, incarcerated individuals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
