CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 210Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and EngagementService-Learning and Community Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Investigation of the Contingent Relationships Between Learning Community Participation and Student Engagement

Pike, Gary R., Kuh, George D., McCormick, Alexander C.·2011·Research in Higher Education
DOI 10.1007/s11162-010-9192-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11162-010-9192-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students' sense of belonging can be positively associated with living in residence halls, being involved in extracurricular activities, and participating in learning communities.

    “Students' sense of belonging can be positively associated with several factors, including living in the residence halls, being involved in extracurricular activities, and participating in learning communities (Berger, 1997; Elkins et al., 2011; Pike et al., 2011; Spanierman et al., 2013).”

    From Sense of Belonging in the Time of COVID-19: Examining the Role of Friendships (2025) · cites this paper as Pike et al., 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297–308.
  4. Astin, A. W. (1985). Involvement: The cornerstone of excellence. Change, 17(4), 35–39. · DOI
  5. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. Baird, L. L. (1976). Using self-reports to predict student performance. New York: The College Board.
  7. Baker, S., & Pomerantz, N. (2000). Impact of learning communities on retention at a metropolitan university. Journal of College Student Retention, 2, 115–126. · DOI
  8. Brower, A. M., Golde, C. M., & Allen, C. (2003). Residential learning communities positively affect college binge drinking. NASPA Journal, 40, 132–144. · DOI
  9. Bryk, A. A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  10. Carini, R. M., Hayek, J. H., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M., & Ouimet, J. A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44, 1–19. · DOI
  11. Cellini, S. R. (2008). Causal inference and omitted variable bias in financial aid research: Assessing solutions. Review of Higher Education, 31, 329–354. · DOI
  12. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Community College Survey of Student Engagement. (2008). High expectations and high support: Essential elements of engagement. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program.
  14. DesJardins, S. L., McCall, B. P., Ahlburg, D. A., & Moye, M. J. (2002). Adding a timing light to the “Tool box”. Research in Higher Education, 43, 83–114. · DOI
  15. Ethington, C. A. (1997). A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XII, pp. 165–194). New York: Agathon.
  16. Ethington, C. A., Thomas, S. L., & Pike, G. R. (2002). Back to the basics: Regression as it should be. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVII, pp. 263–294). New York: Agathon. · DOI
  17. Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature, 1991–2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 746–762. · DOI
  18. Inkelas, K. K., Daver, Z. E., Vogt, K. E., & Leonard, J. B. (2007a). Living-learning programs and first-generation college students’ academic and social transition to college. Research in Higher Education, 48, 403–434. · DOI
  19. Inkelas, K. K., & Weisman, J. L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 335–368. · DOI
  20. Johnson, J. L., & Romanoff, S. J. (1999). Higher education residential learning communities: What are the implications for student success? College Student Journal, 33, 385–399.
  21. Kalton, G. (1983). Introduction to survey sampling (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, no. 35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI
  22. Knight, W. E. (2003). Learning communities and first-year programs: Lessons for planners. Planning for Higher Education, 31(4), 5–12.
  23. Kuh, G. D. (2001a). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17. 66. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kuh, G. D. (2001b). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  25. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32. · DOI
  26. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  27. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. Gonyea & G. Kuh (Eds.), Using student engagement data in institutional research (New Directions for Institutional Research Series, no. 141, pp. 5–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  28. Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J. A., Gonyea, R. M., & Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE technical and norms report. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  29. Kuh, G. D., Hu, S., & Vesper, N. (2000). “They shall be known by what they do:” An activities-based typology of college students. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 228–244.
  30. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., et al. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  31. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., et al. (1991). Involving colleges: Encouraging student learning and personal development through out-of-class experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  32. McCormick, A. C., Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Chen, D. P. (2009). Comparing the utility of the 2000 and 2005 Carnegie classification systems in research on students’ college experiences and outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 50, 144–167. · DOI
  33. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2004). Student engagement: Pathways to collegiate success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  34. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  35. Ouimet, J. A., Bunnage, J. B., Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Kennedy, J. (2004). Using focus groups to establish the validity and reliability of a college student survey. Research in Higher Education, 45, 233–250. · DOI
  36. Pace, C. R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10–16.
  37. Pace, C. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences. An account of the development and use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
  38. Pace, C. R. (1985). The credibility of student self-reports. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California Los Angeles.
  39. Pascarella, E. T., Seifert, T. A., & Blaich, C. (2010). How effective are the NSSE benchmarks in predicting important educational outcomes? Change, 42(1), 16–22. · DOI
  40. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  41. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  42. Pascarella, E. T., Whitt, E. J., Nora, A., Edison, M., Hagedorn, L. S., & Terenzini, P. T. (1996). What have we learned from the first year of the national study of student learning? Journal of College Student Development, 37, 182–192.
  43. Pasque, P. A., & Murphy, R. (2005). The intersections of living-learning programs and social identity as factors of academic achievement and intellectual engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 429–441. · DOI
  44. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Wadsworth.
  45. Peters, J. R., & Stearns, D. E. (2003). Bringing educational relevancy to the first-year college experience by bearing witness to social problems. Journal of Experiential Education, 25, 332–342. · DOI
  46. Pike, G. R. (1995). The relationship between self reports of college experiences and achievement test scores. Research in Higher Education, 36, 1–21. · DOI
  47. Pike, G. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 269–284.
  48. Pike, G. R. (2000). Assessment measures: Methodological issues in the assessment of learning communities. Assessment Update: Progress, Trends and Practices in Higher Education, 12(2), 14–15.
  49. Pike, G. R. (2002). The differential effects of on- and off-campus living arrangements on students’ openness to diversity. NASPA Journal, 39, 283–299. · DOI
  50. Pike, G. R. (2007). Adjusting for nonresponse in surveys. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXII, pp. 411–449). Dordrecht: Springer.
  51. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 46, 185–210. · DOI
  52. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The relationship between institutional mission and students’ involvement and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 44, 243–263.
  53. Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., McCormick, A. C., Ethington, C. A., & Smart, J. C. (in press). If and when money matters: Direct and indirect relationships between expenditures and student learning. Research in Higher Education.
  54. Pike, G. R., Schroeder, C. C., & Berry, T. R. (1997). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: The relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 609–621.
  55. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164. · DOI · Paper page
  56. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
  57. Spencer, J. C. (1998). Student life studies abstract: Learning communities and second-year students. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Office of Student Life Studies.
  58. Stassen, M. L. A. (2003). Student outcomes: The impact of varying living-learning community models. Research in Higher Education, 44, 581–613. · DOI
  59. Thomas, S. L. (2006). Sampling: Rationale and rigor in choosing what to observe. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 393–404). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI
  60. Tinto, V. (2000). What have we learned about the impact of learning communities on students? Assessment Update: Progress, Trends and practices in Higher Education, 12(2), 1–2. 12. · DOI
  61. Titus, M. A. (2007). Detecting selection bias, using propensity score matching, and estimating treatment effects: An application to the private returns to a master’s degree. Research in Higher Education, 48, 487–521. · DOI
  62. Tyler, R. W. (1932). Service studies in higher education. Columbus: Bureau of Educational Research, Ohio State University.
  63. Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & McCormick, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Pike, Gary R.
ORCID
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-10-27
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
300-322
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
DOI
10.1007/s11162-010-9192-1
OpenAlex
W2040335029
Cited by
210
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
32.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Keywords
student engagement, first-year students, older adults, institutional characteristics, National Survey of Student Engagement, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review