The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research
Open accessAbstract
Research on entrepreneurship has flourished in recent years and is evolving rapidly. This article explores the history of entrepreneurship research, how the research domain has evolved, and its current status as an academic field. The need to concretize these issues stems partly from a general interest in defining the current research domain and partly from the more specific tasks confronting the prize committee of the Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship has developed in many sub-fields within several disciplines—primarily economics, management/business administration, sociology, psychology, economic and cultural anthropology, business history, strategy, marketing, finance, and geography—representing a variety of research traditions, perspectives, and methods. We present an analytical framework that organizes our thinking about the domain of entrepreneurship research by specifying elements, levels of analysis, and the process/context. An overview is provided of where the field stands today and how it is positioned relative to the existing disciplines and new research fields upon which it draws. Areas needed for future progress are highlighted, particularly the need for a rigorous dynamic theory of entrepreneurship that relates entrepreneurial activity to economic growth and human welfare. Moreover, applied work based on more careful design as well as on theoretical models yielding more credible and robust estimates seems also highly warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the mechanics of economic development
Lucas, R. E. (1988) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 · Cited by 24,085
Risk Taking Propensity of Entrepreneurs.
Brockhaus, R. H. (1980) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255515 · Cited by 1,733
Cited by
Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence
Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Audretsch, D. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006 · Cited by 678
McAdam, M., Crowley, C., & Harrison, R. T. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.051 · Cited by 153
Hou, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Global Media and China · doi:10.1177/20594364221095895 · Cited by 23
“Although being an entrepreneur means one should take responsibilities of all risks and uncertainties (Carlsson et al., 2013), plenty of underclass still consider the option as attractive since they can achieve independence, self-actualization, and social acknowledgement if they once succeed in…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpää, H.
- Venue
- Small Business Economics
- Published
- 2013-09-21
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 913-930
- ISSN
- 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0913
- OpenAlex
- W2021115567
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y
- The paper
- Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpää, H. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.