The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate?
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This article contributes to the study of process innovation as a growth strategy for SMEs, enriching and complementing the well-researched debate about product innovation. Thus, under-researched process innovation strategies are analyzed, and their antecedents and innovative performance implications explored. The results show that process innovation strategy is mainly shaped by the acquisition of embodied knowledge, which acts as a key mechanism for countering firms’ weak internal capabilities. As process innovation is mainly production oriented, performance consequences are measured using the production process indicators of cost reduction, flexibility and capacity improvement, avoiding traditional misguided measures based on sales, which are more product oriented. Drawing on information for 2,412 firms taken from Spanish CIS data, our results suggest that R&D efforts are not positively related to production process performance, but that the latter is improved by the synchronous co-adoption of organizational and technological innovation. SMEs conducting a process innovation strategy rely heavily on the acquisition of external sources of knowledge in order to complement their weak internal innovative capabilities, and their pattern of innovation shows clear-cut differences from traditional R&D-based product innovation strategies. The article uses a resource-based view framework to generate hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 1×
“These perspectives can be complemented with the knowledgebased view of the firm (Grant 1996; Kogut and Zander 1992), which considers that accumulated experiences or established routines—without focusing particularly on R&D investments—form the base of a firm’s knowledge.”
BackgroundInterorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries
Heidenreich, M. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.005 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach
Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L.-P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010 · Cited by 267
Innovation objectives as determinants of organizational innovations
Meroño-Cerdán, A. L., & López-Nicolás, C. (2017) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2016.1276407 · Cited by 42
Asymmetric modeling of organizational innovation
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Arribas, I. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.04.005 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C.
- Venue
- Small Business Economics
- Published
- 2014-02-26
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 873-886
- ISSN
- 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0913
- OpenAlex
- W1997553398
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 44.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3
- The paper
- Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.