Cited by 44Microfinance and Financial InclusionEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Gender, formality, and entrepreneurial success

Oppedal Berge, Lars Ivar, Garcia Pires, Armando José·2020·Small Business Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11187-019-00163-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oppedal Berge, L. I., & Garcia Pires, A. J.
Venue
Small Business Economics
Published
2019-03-28
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
881-900
ISSN
  • 0921-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0913
OpenAlex
W2928991826
Cited by
44
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small Business Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
women entrepreneurs, informal economy, entrepreneurial success, gender gap in entrepreneurship, access to credit, time constraints, entrepreneurial ability, business training programs, microfinance, developing countries, Tanzania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review