The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,482
Price, D. J. D. S. (1963) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/pric91844 · Cited by 4,264
Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016132 · Cited by 2,613
Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences
Otte, E. (2002) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/016555102762202123 · Cited by 1,709
Studies in scientific collaboration: Part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship
Beaver, D. D., & Rosen, R. (1978) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016840 · Cited by 509
Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199105)42:4<233::aid-asi1>3.0.co;2-i · Cited by 396
de Beaver, D. B., & Rosen, R. (1979) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016966 · Cited by 390
Who Is the Best Connected Scientist?A Study of Scientific Coauthorship Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44485-5_16 · Cited by 379
Glänzel, W. (2002) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 288
White, H. D. (2003) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10228 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective
Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.012 · Cited by 473
Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis
Mejia, C., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.742311 · Cited by 316
Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Díaz-Faes, A. A. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.001 · Cited by 131
Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field
Liu, P., & Xia, H. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1525-y · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2007-12-12
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-202
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2046852280
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
- The paper
- Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
