The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, many studies have demonstrated that OA content attracts more citations [129,133,153-155], although others did not observe significant OA advantage in citation impact [156,157].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [155]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 · Cited by 907
Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact
Lawrence, S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35079151 · Cited by 797
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?
Antelman, K. (2004) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.65.5.372 · Cited by 678
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L. A., Brody, T., & Harnad, S. R. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636 · Cited by 602
(2004) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 526
Priem, J. R., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12684248 · Cited by 459
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a568 · Cited by 419
Piwowar, H. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/493159a · Cited by 398
Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impactPreprint
Priem, J. R., Piwowar, H., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.4745 · Cited by 360
The citation advantage of open‐access articles
Norris, M. W., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20898 · Cited by 238
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
Pranckutė, R. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9010012 · Cited by 2,696
How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed
McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., McDougall, D., Nosek, B. A., Ram, K., Soderberg, C. K., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.16800 · Cited by 798
The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8460.3 · Cited by 560
Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C., & Riegelman, A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253129 · Cited by 291
Raghu Raman, R., Subramaniam, N., Nair, V. K., Shivdas, A., Achuthan, K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159160 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Dalian University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xianwen
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-564
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W1996515099
- Semantic Scholar
- 53ff3be5087e3bcb698d3ad63a109e69c2f3ca66
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 18.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2015-04-04)
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- open access, citation advantage, article downloads, social media attention, article-level metrics, nature communication, scholarly impact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review