CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Back to the past: on the shoulders of an academic search engine giant

Martín-Martín, Alberto, Orduna-Malea, Enrique, Ayllón, Juan M., Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio·2016·Scientometrics
DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-1917-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-016-1917-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Beel, J., & Gipp, B. (2009). Google Scholar’s ranking algorithm: an introductory overview. In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (Vol. 1, pp. 230–241). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  2. Burton, R. E., & Kebler, R. W. (1960). The half-life of some scientific and technical literatures. American Documentation, 11(1), 18–22. · DOI
  3. Davis, P. M. & Cochran, A. (2015). Cited half-life of the journal literature. http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.07479 . Accessed 22 July 2015. · arXiv
  4. Egghe, L. (1993). On the influence of growth on obsolescence. Scientometrics, 27(2), 195–214. · DOI
  5. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: Definitions and relations. Journal of the American Society for information science, 51(11), 1004–1017. · DOI
  6. Gosnell, C. F. (1944). Obsolescence of books in college libraries. College and Research Libraries, 5(2), 115–125. · DOI
  7. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66(1713), 385–389. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Larivière, V., Archambault, É., & Gingras, Y. (2008). Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900–2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 288–296. · DOI
  9. Line, M. B. (1970). The ‘half-life’ of periodical literature: Apparent and real obsolescence. Journal of Documentation, 26(1), 46–52. · DOI
  10. Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllon, J. M. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2014). Does Google Scholar contain all highly cited documents (1950–2013)? EC3 Working Papers, 19. http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8464 . Accessed 22 July 2015. · arXiv
  11. Nakamoto, H. (1988). Synchronous and diachronous citation distributions. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 157–163). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  12. Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllon, J. M., Martín-Martín, A., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2015). Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104(3), 931–949. · DOI
  13. Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2014). Google Scholar Metrics evolution: An analysis according to languages. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2353–2367. · DOI
  14. Orduna-Malea, E., Martín-Martín, A., Ayllon, J. M., & Delgado Lopez-Cozar, E. (2014). The silent fading of an academic search engine: The case of Microsoft Academic Search. Online Information Review, 38(7), 936–953. · DOI
  15. Ortega, J. L. (2014). Academic search engines: A quantitative outlook. Chandos information professional series. Netherlands: Elsevier.
  16. Price, D. J. S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press. · DOI
  17. Ruiz-Baños, R., & Jimenez-Contreras, E. (1996). Envejecimiento de la literatura científica en documentación. Influencia del origen nacional de las revistas. Estudio de una muestra. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 19(1), 39–49. · DOI
  18. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2008). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. D-Lib, 14(11/12). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/tenopir/11tenopir.html . Accessed 22 July 2015. · DOI
  19. Van Noorden, R. (2014). Google Scholar pioneer on search engine’s future. Nature News. http://www.nature.com/news/google-scholar-pioneer-on-search-engine-s-future-1.16269 . Accessed 22 July 2015.
  20. Varshney, L. R. (2012). The Google effect in doctoral theses. Scientometrics, 92(3), 785–793. · DOI
  21. Verstak, A., Acharya, A., Suzuki, H., Henderson, S., Iakhiaev, M., Lin, C. C. Y., et al. (2014). On the shoulders of giants: The growing impact of older articles. http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.0275 . Accessed 22 July 2015. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E.
Venue
Scientometrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-03-19
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
1477-1487
ISSN
  • 0138-9130
  • 1588-2861
DOI
10.1007/s11192-016-1917-2
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BES-2012- 054980)
  • Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (FPU2013/05863)
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (PAID-10-2014)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review