CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Measuring social media activity of scientific literature: an exhaustive comparison of scopus and novel altmetrics big data

Open access
Hassan, Saeed-Ul, Imran, Mubashir, Gillani, Uzair, Aljohani, Naif Radi, Bowman, Timothy D., Didegah, Fereshteh·2017·Scientometrics
DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2512-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-017-2512-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The correlation between altmetrics and scientific impact in the form of citations may not be strong, as altmetrics scores could be primarily driven by factors such as public appeal.

    “Nevertheless, their correlation with scientific impact in the form of citations may not be strong, as altmetrics scores could be primarily driven by factors such as public appeal (De Winter, 2015; Hassan et al., 2017; Pandey Akella et al., 2021; Warren et al., 2017).”

    From Can ChatGPT be used to predict citation counts, readership, and social media interaction? An exploration among 2222 scientific abstracts (2024) · cites this paper as Hassan et al., 2017

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 100

Authors
Hassan, S.-U., Imran, M., Gillani, U., Aljohani, N. R., Bowman, T. D., & Didegah, F.
Affiliations
  • Information Technology University (PK)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hassan, Saeed-Ul
ORCID
Venue
Scientometrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-09-11
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
1037-1057
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
DOI
10.1007/s11192-017-2512-x
OpenAlex
W2613734879
Cited by
100
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
altmetrics, social media activity, Scopus, Altmetric.com, citation impact, highly cited papers, research dissemination, Twitter, blogs, receiver operating characteristic, disciplinary comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review