The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Russian research output indexed in Scopus and Web of Science
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, although the share of conference proceedings articles in Scopus and in WoS is statistically similar (approximately 10%) [52], the majority of studies determined better coverage of conference material in Scopus when compared to WoS [26,39,53,55,57,59].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“Meanwhile, the content coverage of Russian scientific literature was determined to be growing even exponentially, especially in Scopus, although higher growth rates in the coverage of conference material were determined in WoS, when compared to Scopus [52].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“Serial conference proceedings were shown to be highly overlapping between the DBs [40,52].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“during 2006-2016 period the share of papers in Russian-language journals in Scopus increased from 4.8% to 14.8%, while, in WoS, this percentage declined from 6.5% to 3.0% during the same period [52].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“The different conclusions that were drawn from these studies may be related to the differences in the applied time frames, because, while the total number of publications in the DBs is growing steadily, the increase of non-English documents may be more volatile, especially due to the execution of content expansion programs that were focused on specific source types or regions [52].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“the amounts of certain type publications in WoS may be overestimated, as WoS assigns conference papers published in regular journals as both articles and conference papers”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1010549719484 · Cited by 433
Self-citationvan Raan, A. F. J. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_2 · Cited by 279
Empirical Analysis and Classification of Database Errors in Scopus and Web of Science
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003 · Cited by 225
What Have We Learned About Science and Technology from the Russian Experience?
Graham, L. R. (1998) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503616639 · Cited by 164
Applied Evaluative Informetrics
Moed, H. F. (2017) · Qualitative and quantitative analysis of scientific and scholarly communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7 · Cited by 153
Self-citationWhat have we learned about science and technology from the Russian experience?
Graham, L. R. (1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-1542 · Cited by 123
BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23333 · Cited by 122
Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: an analysis of international coauthorship
Finardi, U., & Buratti, A. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1927-0 · Cited by 79
Wilson, C. S., & Markusova, V. A. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000018539.93567.d8 · Cited by 54
Self-citationInfluence of the program “5–top 100” on the publication activity of Russian universities
Turko, T. I., Bakhturin, G., Bagan, V. A., Poloskov, S. S., & Gudym, D. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2060-9 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- CSAB. (n.d.). https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content/scopus-content-selection-and-advisory-board . Last Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- Elsevier. (n.d.). https://www.elsevier.com/?a=212275 . Last Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- Mindeli, L. (2013) (ed.). Russian Academy of Sciences in numbers (2013). Statistical issue. IPRAN RAS, Moscow.
- Neicon. (2017). The 5th NEICON international conference “electronic resources for research and education: Development, promotion and use”. Jesolo, Italy, 25 Sept–1 Oct 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–141 of 141
Иванов, Д. В., & Deviatko, I. F. (2024) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2024.6.2627 · Cited by 1
A cross‐country analysis and comparison of the technical efficiency of higher education systems
del Corral, J., de la Torre, E. M., Solís, D., & Moraga‐Fernández, M. (2025) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.70013 · Cited by 1
Kesoyan, G., Shushanyan, R. A., Ohanyan, M., Shahkhatuni, A. G., Yeghikyan, M., & Андреевич, Б. В. (2025) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2025.101704 · Cited by 1
Results of bibliometric analysis of the publication activity on the scientific library website
Kharybina, T. N., & Beskaravajnaja, E. V. (2020) · Science management theory and practice · doi:10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.9 · Cited by 1
Trends in the Publication Activity of Russian Organizations from 2000 to 2019
Blinov, P. Y., Kosyakov, D. V., Malysheva, A. V., & Гуськов, А. Е. (2022) · Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics · doi:10.3103/s0005105522040070 · Cited by 1
A Decade of Sustainable FinTech Research
Kumar, S., Kotni, V. V. D. P., & Patra, S. K. (2023) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0008-4.ch014 · Cited by 1
The contribution of universities to the production of basic scientific knowledge in Russia
Lovakova, A. V., & Panova, A. A. (2023) · Вестник Российской академии наук · doi:10.31857/s0869587323010036 · Cited by 1
Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks
Maltseva, D., Pavlova, I. A., Kapustina, L., Vashchenko, V., & Fiala, D. (2024) · Sociology methodology methods mathematical modeling (Sociology 4M) · doi:10.19181/4m.2023.32.1.1 · Cited by 1
Global Ranking of Expertise about Russia
Губа, К. С., Александровна, Ч. Е., Tsivinskaya, A. O., & Buravoy, N. (2024) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2024.2386995 · Cited by 1
Integração de bases de dados em estudos bibliométricos: a produção científica nacional em Zika vírus
Alencar, M. S. D. M., Bochner, R., & Giacometti, D. (2018) · Em Questão · doi:10.19132/1808-5245240.13-28 · Cited by 1
Markusova, V. A., Mindeli, L., Александрович, Р. Д., Zolotova, A., Akoev, M., & Либкинд, А. Н. (2019) · Научно-техническая информация Серия 2 Информационные процессы и системы · doi:10.36535/0548-0027-2019-12-1 · Cited by 1
Self-citationАндреевич, С. И., Savina, T. F., & Chichkova, A. O. (2020) · Научно- техническая информация Серия 1 Организация и методика информационной работы · doi:10.36535/0548-0019-2020-02-2 · Cited by 1
Lyude, A., Boiarskii, B., & Hasegawa, H. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/677/5/052114 · Cited by 1
Santos, C. D. C., Lopes, M., Monteiro, R. F. B. L., Vieira, C. C., & Ferreira, V. (2024) · ex aequo - Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Estudos sobre as Mulheres · doi:10.22355/exaequo.2024.49.14 · Cited by 1
Pecherskikh, A. (2025) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/s12108-025-09669-z · Cited by 1
Kim, E. (2019) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
The Altmetrics of Henk Moed’s Publications
Bar‐Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_15
Russian Publications in «Informatics»: Trends of Development
Glushanovskiy, A. V. (2021) · Scholarly Research and Information · doi:10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-4-278-286
Russian Pattern of Altmetrics Usage based on SCI-E Statistics
Markusova, V. A., Zolotova, A., Kotel’nikova, N., & Libkind, A. (2020) · Second International Conference on Science & Technology Metrics · doi:10.6025/stm/2020/2/14-22
Self-citationCurrent State and Evolution of Russians Publication for Computer Science Flow (short paper).
Glushanovskiy, A. V., & Vlasova, S. P. (2020)
Current State and Evolution of Russians Publication for Computer Science FlowPreprint
Glushanovskiy, A. V., & Vlasova, S. A. (2021) · doi:10.51218/1613-0073-2990-84-92
Tausch, A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3950846
Russian contribution to research on virology: bibliometrics analysis, 2000-2019 on Web of Science
Markusova, V. A., Zolotova, A., & Libkind, A. (2021) · DLINE eBooks · doi:10.6025/stm/2021/3/68-75
Self-citationDatabases of scientific citation as a factor of destruction of science in Russia and in the World
Erstein, L. B. (2022) · Alma mater Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly · doi:10.20339/am.03-22.085
Bibliometric Indicators in the Clarivate Databases
Pislyakov, V. V. (2021) · Ural University Press eBooks · doi:10.15826/b978-5-7996-3154-3.008
Либкинд, А. Н., Tsvetkova, V. A., Salekh, A. Z., Zolotova, A., Kotelnikova, N. A., & Markusova, V. A. (2023) · Scientific and Technical Libraries · doi:10.33186/1027-3689-2023-12-15-40
Self-citationWeb Scraping Data Collection from Leather Craft E-Commerce
Nugroho, C., Kurniawan, A., Irawan, B. H., Prihadi, D., Hananto, A. L., & Tukino, T. (2023) · Edutran Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.59805/ecsit.v1i2.81
Social Sciences and Humanities in post- soviet period in Russia: Bibliometric analysis, 1993-2022
Markusova, V. A., Tsvetkova, V. A., Zolotova, A., Kotel’nikova, N., & Libkind, A. (2023) · DLINE eBooks · doi:10.6025/stm/2023/4/83-92
Self-citationResearch Performance of Federal Research Centers: Is There Any Effect from Restructuring?
Kosyakov, D. V., & Blinov, P. Y. (2024) · Scientific and Technical Information Processing · doi:10.3103/s0147688224010088
Anikina, Z., Girfanova, K. A., & Goncharova, L. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01292-0
Approaches to Selecting Citation Sources in Articles by Russian Media and Communication Researchers
Anisimov, I. V., Makeenko, M., & Trishchenko, N. D. (2024) · Scientific and Technical Information Processing · doi:10.3103/s0147688224700205
Создание российских информационных баз данных научной литературы
Цзян, С. (2024) · Management of Education · doi:10.25726/w4300-6727-9822-d
Spasennikov, V. (2025) · Ergodesign · doi:10.30987/2658-4026-2025-2-261-266
Firdaus, R., Yunus, M., Rusdi, M., & Ibrahim, M. A. (2025) · KnE Social Sciences · doi:10.18502/kss.v10i16.19188
Beyond collaboration: examining co-authorship patterns in questionable journals
Губа, К. С. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05426-8 · Cited by 1
Limits of metrics-led internationalization: the case of Russian media studies
Trishchenko, N. D., Makeenko, M., & Anisimov, I. V. (2025) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-025-02472-5
Türkiye Versus Turkey: Tracking the Adoption of the Official Country Name in Academic Publishing
da Silva, J. A. T., & Nazarovets, S. (2025) · Internet Reference Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10875301.2025.2565176
Habiburrahman, I. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10439292/v1
Who gets retracted? Gendered patterns in academic article retractions in Indonesia
Kamil, R., & Rahmi, R. (2026) · Information Research · doi:10.47989/ir31356229
Metadata
- Authors
- Moed, H. F., Markusova, V., & Akoev, M.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Ural Federal University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Moed, Henk F.
- Markusova, Valentina
- Akoev, Mark
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2018-05-11
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1153-1180
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2799340358
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 11.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- elar.urfu.ru
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
- Electronic Archive of Ural Federal University (ELAR UrFU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Russian Foundation of Basic Research (17-02-00157)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- Scopus, Web of Science, bibliographic database coverage, Project 5-100, research performance indicators, internationalization of research, publication trends, document types, language of publication, academic disciplines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
