Cited by 103scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open AccessWeb visibility and informetrics

Do Articles in Open Access Journals Have More Frequent Altmetric Activity than Articles in Subscription - Based Journals? An Investigation of the Research Output of Finnish Universities

Open access
Holmberg, Kim, Hedman, Juha, Bowman, Timothy D., Didegah, Fereshteh, Laakso, Mikael·2020·Scientometrics

Abstract

Scientific articles available in Open Access (OA) have been found to attract more citations and online attention to the extent that it has become common to speak about OA Altmetrics Advantage. This research investigates how the OA Altmetrics Advantage holds for a specific case of research articles, namely the research outputs from universities in Finland. Furthermore, this research examines disciplinary and platform specific differences in that (dis)advantage. The new methodological approaches developed in this research focus on relative visibility, i.e. how often articles in OA journals receive at least one mention on the investigated online platforms, and relative receptivity, i.e. how frequently articles in OA journals gain mentions in comparison to articles in subscription-based journals. The results show significant disciplinary and platform specific differences in the OA advantage, with articles in OA journals within for instance veterinary sciences, social and economic geography and psychology receiving more citations and attention on social media platforms, while the opposite was found for articles in OA journals within medicine and health sciences. The results strongly support field- and platform-specific considerations when assessing the influence of journal OA status on altmetrics. The new methodological approaches used in this research will serve future comparative research into OA advantage of scientific articles over time and between countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 103

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing mul- tidimensional indicators of performance (pp. 263-287). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  2. Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Authors
Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F., & Laakso, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Hanken School of Economics (FI)
Corresponding author
Holmberg, Kim
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2019-11-15
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
645-659
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W2989484692
Cited by
103
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
Turun Yliopisto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
open access, altmetrics, subscription journals, online attention, social media mentions, citation impact, disciplinary differences, platform differences, Finnish universities, research visibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review