Do Articles in Open Access Journals Have More Frequent Altmetric Activity than Articles in Subscription - Based Journals? An Investigation of the Research Output of Finnish Universities
Open accessAbstract
Scientific articles available in Open Access (OA) have been found to attract more citations and online attention to the extent that it has become common to speak about OA Altmetrics Advantage. This research investigates how the OA Altmetrics Advantage holds for a specific case of research articles, namely the research outputs from universities in Finland. Furthermore, this research examines disciplinary and platform specific differences in that (dis)advantage. The new methodological approaches developed in this research focus on relative visibility, i.e. how often articles in OA journals receive at least one mention on the investigated online platforms, and relative receptivity, i.e. how frequently articles in OA journals gain mentions in comparison to articles in subscription-based journals. The results show significant disciplinary and platform specific differences in the OA advantage, with articles in OA journals within for instance veterinary sciences, social and economic geography and psychology receiving more citations and attention on social media platforms, while the opposite was found for articles in OA journals within medicine and health sciences. The results strongly support field- and platform-specific considerations when assessing the influence of journal OA status on altmetrics. The new methodological approaches used in this research will serve future comparative research into OA advantage of scientific articles over time and between countries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have demonstrated that OA content attracts more citations, although others did not observe a significant OA advantage in citation impact.
“Indeed, many studies have demonstrated that OA content attracts more citations [129,133,153-155], although others did not observe significant OA advantage in citation impact [156,157].”
From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [156]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 103
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Priem, J. (2014). Altmetrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing mul- tidimensional indicators of performance (pp. 263-287). Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Authors
- Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F., & Laakso, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Turku (FI)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Hanken School of Economics (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Holmberg, Kim
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 2019-11-15
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 645-659
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2989484692
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientometrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Turun Yliopisto
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- open access, altmetrics, subscription journals, online attention, social media mentions, citation impact, disciplinary differences, platform differences, Finnish universities, research visibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review