CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 83scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsLibrary Science and Information

Funding Information in Web of Science: An Updated Overview

Open access
Liu, Weishu, Tang, Li, Hu, Guangyuan·2020·Scientometrics
DOI 10.1007/s11192-020-03362-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-020-03362-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The coverage of funding information in both databases, especially Scopus, may not be comprehensive enough for accurate and reliable analyses of funding trends in SSH and research with strong national orientation.

    “the majority of authors agree that, in the meantime, in both DBs (especially in Scopus) the coverage of FI may not be comprehensive enough for accurate and reliable analyses of funding trends in SSH and in research with strong national orientation.”

    From Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021) · cites this paper as [77]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 83

Authors
Liu, W., Tang, L., & Hu, G.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Guangyuan
ORCID
Venue
Scientometrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-01-25
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
1509-1524
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
DOI
10.1007/s11192-020-03362-3
OpenAlex
W3002010585
Cited by
83
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71801189)
  • Ministry of Education of China (18YJAZH027)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ18G030010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
funding acknowledgment, Web of Science, Chinese-language publications, humanities and social sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review