Cited by 189Recommender Systems and Techniquesscientometrics and bibliometrics researchTopic Modeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A context-aware citation recommendation model with BERT and graph convolutional networks

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11192-020-03561-y

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. He, Q., Kifer, D., Pei, J., Mitra, P., & Giles, C. L. (2011). In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on web search and data mining (pp. 755–764). ACM
  2. He, Q., Pei, J., Kifer, D., Mitra, P., & Giles, L. (2010). In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 421–430). ACM
  3. Huang, W., Wu, Z., Liang, C., Mitra, P., & Giles, C. L. (2015). In Proceedings of the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 2404–2410). AAAI Press.
  4. Kang, D., Ammar, W., Dalvi, B., van Zuylen, M., Kohlmeier, S., Hovy, E., & Schwartz, R. (2018). In Proceedings of the 2018 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) (Vol. 1, pp. 1647–1661).
  5. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv e-prints
  6. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2016). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 · arXiv
  7. Le, Q., & Mikolov, T. (2014). Distributed representations of sentences and documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.4053 · arXiv
  8. Radev, D. R., Muthukrishnan, P., & Qazvinian, V. (2009). In Proceedings, ACL workshop on natural language processing and information retrieval for digital libraries. Singapore
  9. Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., & Wierstra, D. (2014). In Proceedings of the 31st international conference on international conference on machine learning—Volume 32 (JMLR.org), ICML’14 (pp. II–1278–II–1286). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3044805.3045035

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jeong, C., Jang, S., Park, E., & Choi, S.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Naver (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Park, Eunjeong
  • Choi, Sungchul
Venue
Scientometrics
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
1907-1922
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
OpenAlex
W3043016077
Cited by
186
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 12
FWCI
29.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07045825, NRF-2015R1C1A1A01056185)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
citation recommendation, BERT, graph convolutional networks, context encoder, scientific writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review