The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Objectification Theory as It Relates to Disordered Eating Among College Women
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531 · cited 23×
“…and it was explored in order to further investigate a fundamental proposition of objectification theory: sexual objectification should predict disordered eating only indirectly through its associations with other variables (i.e., body surveillance and body shame; Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Cited by
Objectification Theory and Psychology of Women: A Decade of Advances and Future Directions
Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x · Cited by 1,071
Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.
Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., Lalumière, M. L., Laan, E., & Grimbos, T. (2010) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9 · Cited by 584
Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.9 · Cited by 501
Fardouly, J., Willburger, B. K., & Vartanian, L. R. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817694499 · Cited by 421
Knauss, C., Paxton, S. J., & Alsaker, F. D. (2008) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9474-7 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S.
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 719-730
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2047909591
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
