Cited by 66Gender Studies in LanguageLinguistic Variation and MorphologyGender and Feminist Studies

Acceptability of sexist language among young people in Hong Kong

Lee, Jackie F. K.·2007·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-006-9170-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. F. K.
Affiliations
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jackie F. K.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2007-02-16
Volume
56
Issue
5-6
Pages
285-295
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W1982008679
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
  • Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
sexist language, gender-inclusive language, gender-neutral pronouns, generic he, Hong Kong English, occupational terminology, youth, gender differences in language, feminist movements, language attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review