Cited by 201Income, Poverty, and InequalityPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionQuality of Life Measurement

Are One Man’s Rags Another Man’s Riches? Identifying Adaptive Expectations using Panel Data

Burchardt, Tania·2005·Social Indicators Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11205-005-6519-y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Persons who have fewer opportunities due to social factors such as racism, sexism, poverty, or disability may adapt their preferences to what they are likely to get.

    “Persons who have fewer opportunities due to a variety of social factors-such as racism, sex- ism, poverty, or disability-may adapt their preferences to what they are likely to get (Burchardt, 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Burchardt, T.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Burchardt, Tania
Venue
Social Indicators Research
Published
2005-10
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
57-102
ISSN
  • 0303-8300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0921
OpenAlex
W2080152340
Cited by
201
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
74.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Indicators Research (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
Keywords
adaptive expectations, adaptive preferences, subjective well-being, financial satisfaction, income change, income trajectories, capability approach, inequality measurement, social justice, British Household Panel Survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review