Cited by 554Planetary Science and ExplorationLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping

The ChemCam Instrument Suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Rover: Body Unit and Combined System Tests

Open access
Wiens, Roger C., Maurice, Sylvestre, Barraclough, Bruce, Saccoccio, Muriel, Barkley, Walter C., Bell, James F., Bender, Steve, Bernardin, John +72 more·2012·Space Science Reviews

Abstract

The ChemCam instrument suite on the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover Curiosity provides remote compositional information using the first laser-induced breakdown spectrometer (LIBS) on a planetary mission, and provides sample texture and morphology data using a remote micro-imager (RMI). Overall, ChemCam supports MSL with five capabilities: remote classification of rock and soil characteristics; quantitative elemental compositions including light elements like hydrogen and some elements to which LIBS is uniquely sensitive (e.g., Li, Be, Rb, Sr, Ba); remote removal of surface dust and depth profiling through surface coatings; context imaging; and passive spectroscopy over the 240–905 nm range. ChemCam is built in two sections: The mast unit, consisting of a laser, telescope, RMI, and associated electronics, resides on the rover’s mast, and is described in a companion paper. ChemCam’s body unit, which is mounted in the body of the rover, comprises an optical demultiplexer, three spectrometers, detectors, their coolers, and associated electronics and data handling logic. Additional instrument components include a 6 m optical fiber which transfers the LIBS light from the telescope to the body unit, and a set of onboard calibration targets. ChemCam was integrated and tested at Los Alamos National Laboratory where it also underwent LIBS calibration with 69 geological standards prior to integration with the rover. Post-integration testing used coordinated mast and instrument commands, including LIBS line scans on rock targets during system-level thermal-vacuum tests. In this paper we describe the body unit, optical fiber, and calibration targets, and the assembly, testing, and verification of the instrument prior to launch.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11214-012-9902-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In carbon-free samples analyzed at a given distance, contributions of atmospheric carbon and oxygen result in correlated C and O signals, whose intensities depend on laser-target coupling efficiency.

    “previous work has shown that in carbon-free samples analyzed at a given distance, the contributions of atmospheric carbon and oxygen result in correlated C and O signals, whose intensities depend on the laser-target coupling efficiency (Beck etal., 2017; Gasnault et al., 2012; Wiens et al., 2012).”
  • Breakdown of atmospheric CO2 from the Martian atmosphere in the plasma results in systematic C detection in Martian LIBS spectra.

    “However, the breakdown of atmospheric CO 2 from the Martian atmosphere in the plasma results in systematic C detection in Martian LIBS spectra (Dequaire etal.,2017; Schröder etal.,2019; Wiens etal.,2012).”
  • At a given distance, targets containing carbonates show a higher C signal and a higher carbon-to-oxygen ratio.

    “It has been shown that, at a given distance, targets containing carbonates show a higher C signal, and a higher carbon-to-oxygen ratio.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiens, R. C., Maurice, S., Barraclough, B., Saccoccio, M., Barkley, W. C., Bell, J. F., Bender, S., Bernardin, J., Blaney, D., Blank, J., Bouyé, M., Bridges, N., Bultman, N., Caïs, P., Clanton, R. C., Clark, B., Clegg, S., Cousin, A., Cremers, D., Cros, A., DeFlores, L., Delapp, D., Dingler, R., D’Uston, C., Darby Dyar, M., Elliott, T., Enemark, D., Fabre, C., Flores, M., Forni, O., Gasnault, O., Hale, T., Hays, C., Herkenhoff, K., Kan, E., Kirkland, L., Kouach, D., Landis, D., Langevin, Y., Lanza, N., LaRocca, F., Lasue, J., Latino, J., Limonadi, D., Lindensmith, C., Little, C., Mangold, N., Manhes, G., Mauchien, P., McKay, C., Miller, E., Mooney, J., Morris, R. V., Morrison, L., Nelson, T., Newsom, H., Ollila, A., Ott, M., Pares, L., Perez, R., Poitrasson, F., Provost, C., Reiter, J. W., Roberts, T., Romero, F., Sautter, V., Salazar, S., Simmonds, J. J., Stiglich, R., Storms, S., Striebig, N., Thocaven, J.-J., Trujillo, T., Ulibarri, M., Vaniman, D., Warner, N., Waterbury, R., Whitaker, R., Witt, J., & Wong-Swanson, B.
Affiliations
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Planetary Science Institute (US)
  • Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR)
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Space Science Institute (US)
  • Applied Research Associates (United States) (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Lunar and Planetary Institute (US)
  • Draper Laboratory (US)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Laboratoire de Minéralogie & Cosmochimie du Muséum (FR)
  • Ocean Optics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wiens, Roger C.
Venue
Space Science Reviews
Published
2012-06-21
Volume
170
Issue
1-4
Pages
167-227
ISSN
  • 0038-6308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9672
OpenAlex
W1996484899
Cited by
554
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Space Science Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • USRA Houston Repository (Lunar and Planetary Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Keywords
ChemCam, Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity rover, optical demultiplexer, optical fibers, thermal vacuum testing, Mars surface composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review