The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2004) · Cited by 5,198
A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies
Jørgensen, M., & Shepperd, M. (2007) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.3 · Cited by 742
A Systematic Review of Software Development Cost Estimation Studies
Jorgensen, M., & Shepperd, M. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.256943 · Cited by 729
Systematic Review in Software Engineering
Biolchini, J. C. D. A., & Mian, P. G. (2005) · Cited by 561
Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering
de Almeida Biolchini, J. C., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., Conte, T. U., & Travassos, G. H. (2007) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2006.11.006 · Cited by 391
An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI
Staples, M., Niazi, M., Jeffery, R., Abrahams, A., Byatt, P., & Murphy, R. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.008 · Cited by 260
An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement
Dyba, T. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2005.53 · Cited by 256
A Systematic Review of Theory Use in Software Engineering Experiments
Hannay, J. E., Sjoberg, D. I. K., & Dyba, T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.12 · Cited by 226
Systematic review of organizational motivations for adopting CMM-based SPI
Staples, M., & Niazi, M. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.07.003 · Cited by 160
Practical Software Measurement: Measuring for Process Management and Improvement
Florac, W. A., Park, R. E., & Carleton, A. D. (2018) · doi:10.1184/r1/6582080.v1 · Cited by 94
Cited by
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Pearl Brereton, O., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,230
Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study
Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., & Abrahamsson, P. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.014 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Pino, F. J., García, F., & Piattini, M.
- Venue
- Software Quality Journal
- Published
- 2007-11-21
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 237-261
- ISSN
- 0963-9314 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1367
- OpenAlex
- W1988388703
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11219-007-9038-z
- The paper
- Pino, F. J., García, F., & Piattini, M. (2008). Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic review. Software Quality Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-007-9038-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
