Analytical models for availability evaluation of edge and fog computing nodes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed method's loss function is significantly lower than methods [3], [8], and [13] for high regularization and object representation parameters.
“Furthermore, it is plausible that the loss of the suggested method is significantly lower for high regularization and object representation parameters in the comparison research.”
From Development of edge computing and classification using The Internet of Things with incremental learning for object detection (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The loss numbers of current methods [3], [8], and [13] are substantially larger because edge detection methodology is not used.
“However, since edge detection methodology is not used in the current method [3,8,13], the loss numbers are substantially larger.”
From Development of edge computing and classification using The Internet of Things with incremental learning for object detection (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Pereira, P., Araujo, J., Melo, C., Santos, V., & Maciel, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco (BR)
- Instituto Federal de Goiás (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Pereira, Paulo
- Venue
- The Journal of Supercomputing
- Published
- 2021-02-20
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 9905-9933
- ISSN
- 0920-8542 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0484
- OpenAlex
- W3130636206
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Supercomputing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Keywords
- edge computing, fog computing, system availability, fault tolerance, Internet of Things, delay-sensitive applications, cost evaluation, infrastructure planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
