Cited by 32Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Mechanistic explanation at the limit

Waskan, Jonathan·2011·Synthese

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11229-010-9869-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 32

Authors
Waskan, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Waskan, Jonathan
Venue
Synthese
Published
2011-01-19
Volume
183
Issue
3
Pages
389-408
ISSN
  • 0039-7857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0964
OpenAlex
W1965892063
Cited by
32
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Synthese (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
mechanistic explanation, James Woodward, causal explanation, causal claims, actualism, causal perception, causal beliefs, mechanical reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review