Cited by 18Animal Genetics and ReproductionCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Using standard nomenclature to adequately name transgenes, knockout gene alleles and any mutation associated to a genetically modified mouse strain

Montoliu, Lluís, Whitelaw, C. Bruce A.·2011·Transgenic Research

Abstract

Mice provide an unlimited source of animal models to study mammalian gene function and human diseases. The powerful genetic modification toolbox existing for the mouse genome enables the creation of, literally, thousands of genetically modified mouse strains, carrying spontaneous or induced mutations, transgenes or knock-out/knock-in alleles which, in addition, can exist in hundreds of different genetic backgrounds. Such an immense diversity of individuals needs to be adequately annotated, to ensure that the most relevant information is kept associated with the name of each mouse line, and hence, the scientific community can correctly interpret and benefit from the reported animal model. Therefore, rules and guidelines for correctly naming genes, alleles and mouse strains are required. The Mouse Genome Informatics Database is the authoritative source of official names for mouse genes, alleles, and strains. Nomenclature follows the rules and guidelines established by the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice. Herewith, both from the International Society for Transgenic Technologies (ISTT) and from the scientific journal Transgenic Research, we would like to encourage all our colleagues to adhere and follow adequately the standard nomenclature rules when describing mouse models. The entire scientific community using genetically modified mice in experiments will benefit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11248-010-9428-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reporting the correct nomenclature is crucial to understanding the data and ensuring that the research is discoverable and replicable.

    “Reporting the correct nomenclature is crucial to understanding the data and ensuring that the research is discoverable and replicable [116–118].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montoliu, L., & Whitelaw, C. B. A.
Venue
Transgenic Research
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
435-440
ISSN
  • 0962-8819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9368
OpenAlex
W2021070828
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transgenic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
genetically modified mice, transgenes, knockout alleles, knock-in allele, gene nomenclature, animal models
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Biotechnology, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Terminology as Topic, Reference Standards, Societies, Scientific, Mice, Knockout, Transgenes, Models, Animal, Animals, Genetically Modified, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review