Cited by 13Animal Genetics and ReproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Depot formation of doxycycline impairs Tet-regulated gene expression in vivo

Anders, Kathleen, Buschow, Christian, Charo, Jehad, Blankenstein, Thomas·2012·Transgenic Research

Abstract

The tetracycline (Tet) system is widely used for regulation of gene expression in vitro and in vivo. We constructed C57BL/6 transgenic mice (rtTA-CM2) with strong and ubiquitous reverse transactivator (rtTA2(S)-M2) gene expression. rtTA-CM2 mice were crossed to Tet-responsive reporter mice (LC-1) conditionally expressing the firefly luciferase (FLuc) gene under control of a Tet-responsive element, which allowed sensitive quantification of the transactivator activity by bioluminescent imaging. Following doxycycline (dox) application, up to 10(5)-fold increase in BL signal was measured. rtTA activity was inducible in most analyzed organs. After dox withdrawal the BL signal decreased significantly but did not disappear completely, most likely due to a dox depot formation in vivo. The residual dox was sufficient to partly down-regulate a Tet-off controlled oncogene in a tumor transplantation experiment, resulting in reduced tumor growth. rtTA-CM2 mice may be a useful tool to analyze the function of genes in various organs but also reveal that down-regulation of gene expression is not complete.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11248-011-9580-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A more dox-sensitive rtTA variant, like V16, may demonstrate prolonged activity when the dox level drops after dox-withdrawal.

    “Another obvious issue to take into consideration is that a more dox-sensitive rtTA variant, like V16, may demonstrate prolonged activity when the dox level drops after dox-withdrawal [84].”

    From Tet-On Systems For Doxycycline-inducible Gene Expression (2016) · cites this paper as [84]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 13

Authors
Anders, K., Buschow, C., Charo, J., & Blankenstein, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Blankenstein, Thomas
Venue
Transgenic Research
Published
2011-12-14
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
1099-1107
ISSN
  • 0962-8819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9368
OpenAlex
W1970289038
Cited by
13
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transgenic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
tetracycline-inducible expression, bioluminescence imaging, tumor growth inhibition, conditional gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming, Antineoplastic Agents, Crosses, Genetic, Doxycycline, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Luciferases, Luminescent Measurements, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Microinjections, Oocytes, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Simian virus 40, Transcription, Genetic, Oncogene Proteins, Fusion, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Founder Effect, Transgenes, Mice, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review