Cited by 29Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect Resistance and GeneticsInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The effect of Bt crops on soil invertebrates: a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis

Open access
Krogh, Paul Henning, Kostov, Kaloyan, Damgaard, Christian Frølund·2020·Transgenic Research

Abstract

The ongoing debate about the ecological effects of Bt-crops calls for thorough reviews about the impact on soil biodiversity and their ecosystem services. Transgenic Bt-crops have been genetically modified by inserting a Bacillus thuriengensis gene so the plant expresses a Cry toxin aimed for insect crop pests. Non-target soil invertebrates are particularly recognized for their contribution to plant nutrient availability and turnover of organic matter and it is therefore relevant to protect these invertebrate taxa. A number of studies have compared the population abundance and biomass of soil invertebrates in agricultural fields planted with genetically modified Bt crops and their conventional counterparts. Here, were review and analyze a selection of studies on Protista, nematodes, Collembola, mites, enchytraeids, and earthworms systematically to empower the evidence for asking the question whether population abundances and biomasses of soil invertebrates are changed by Bt crops compared to conventional crops. 6110 titles were captured, of which 38 studies passed our inclusion criteria, and a final number of 22 publications were subject to data extraction. A database with 2046 records was compiled covering 36 locations and the Bt types Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry3Bb1 and Cry3Aa. Comparative effect sizes in terms of Hedges' g were calculated irrespectively of statistical significance of effects of the source studies. Cry effects on populations were compared across the studies in a meta-analysis employing a hierarchical Bayesian approach of weighted data according to the level of replication. The temporal development of effect sizes was modelled, thereby taking into account the variable duration of the field experiments. There was considerable variation among soil invertebrate orders, but the sample size was insufficient and the sample heterogeneity too large to draw any credible conclusions on the effect of Cry at the order level. However, across orders there was no significant effect of Cry on soil invertebrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11248-020-00213-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 29

Authors
Krogh, P. H., Kostov, K., & Damgaard, C. F.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Agrobioinstitute (BG)
Corresponding author
Damgaard, Christian Frølund
Venue
Transgenic Research
Published
2020-09-05
Volume
29
Issue
5-6
Pages
487-498
ISSN
  • 0962-8819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9368
OpenAlex
W3083319952
Cited by
29
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transgenic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
EU (EU FP7-KBBE/311957)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Bt crops, soil invertebrates, delta-endotoxin, Bacillus thuringiensis, soil biodiversity, earthworms, nematodes, Collembola, mites, Enchytraeidae, protists, genetically modified crops, non-target effects, Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry3Bb1, soil ecosystem services
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacillus thuringiensis, Invertebrates, Soil, Crops, Agricultural, Plants, Genetically Modified, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review