Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structured tools such as reflective journals, guided self-assessment forms, and annotated exemplars can effectively scaffold the self-reflection process.
“Structured tools such as reflective journals, guided self-assessment forms, and annotated exemplars can effectively scaffold the self-reflection process [8,112,113].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Queens College, CUNY (US)
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Lipnevich, Anastasiya A.
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2013-11-21
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 539-559
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W2040457876
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- formative assessment, exemplars, research proposal writing, writing revision, student self-assessment, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
