Cited by 60Wildlife Ecology and ConservationHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal and Plant Science Education

Coexisting with coyotes (Canis latrans) in an urban environment

Elliot, Elizabeth E., Vallance, Suzanne, Molles, Laura E.·2016·Urban Ecosystems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11252-016-0544-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coyotes are a predatory species and often invoke fear-whether that be loss of life, livelihood, or economic gain.

    “Coyotes are a predatory species and often invoke fear --whether that be loss of life, livelihood, or economic gain (Knowlton et al., 1999;Elliot et al., 2016).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 60

Authors
Elliot, E. E., Vallance, S., & Molles, L. E.
Affiliations
Lincoln University (NZ)
Venue
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
1335-1350
ISSN
  • 1083-8155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1642
OpenAlex
W2278291671
Cited by
60
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urban Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lincoln University (NZ)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
Keywords
coyote, human-wildlife conflict, urban wildlife, attitudes toward wildlife, fear of wildlife, wildlife knowledge, urban wildlife management, reconciliation ecology, Chicago, Los Angeles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review