The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management of nature-based goods and services provisioning from the urban common: a pan-European perspective
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is related inconsistency in science–policy integration and knowledge transfer at strategic and urban planning levels (26, 48, 56, 59, 63, 66–68) as well as limited evaluation of how NbS generate or contribute to financial benefits (69).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
In the citing paper
“Additional barriers include fragmented environmental policies and the need for coordination of actors at different levels of governance for climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation (68).”
From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
Citations
Cites
Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006 · Cited by 3,099
Guidelines for systematic review in Conservation and environmental management
PULLIN, A. S., & STEWART, G. B. (2006) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x · Cited by 1,137
Livesley, S. J., McPherson, E. G., & Calfapietra, C. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567 · Cited by 904
How to make a city climate-proof, addressing the urban heat island effect
Kleerekoper, L., van Esch, M., & Salcedo, T. B. (2012) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.004 · Cited by 648
Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning
Pauleit, S., & Duhme, F. (2000) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(00)00109-2 · Cited by 483
The potential of ‘Urban Green Commons’ in the resilience building of cities
Colding, J., & Barthel, S. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016 · Cited by 478
Bauduceau, N., Berry, P. M., Cecchi, C., Elmqvist, T., Dinarès, M., Hartig, T., Krull, W., Mayerhofer, E., Sandra, N. O., Noring, L., et al. (2015) · doi:10.2777/765301 · Cited by 440
The impact of greening systems on building energy performance: A literature review
Raji, B., Tenpierik, M. J., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.011 · Cited by 388
Ecological and aesthetic values in urban forest management
Tyrväinen, L., Silvennoinen, H., & Kolehmainen, O. (2003) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00014 · Cited by 361
Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Strohbach, M., Kroll, F., & Seppelt, R. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04853-170322 · Cited by 354
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Barbante E, Calvo E., Sanesi G, Selleri B, Verlič A, Vilhar U (2015) Urban and periurban forests: management, monitoring and ecosystem services. Emonfur Life +project experiences, pp. 279
- Chisăliță I, Vasile D, Dincă L (2017) Unele specii de plante culese din parcul Bazoș, județul Timiș, existente în colecția Herbarului Alexandru Beldie de la INCDS București. Revista de Silvicultură și Cinegetică 40:71–76
- Enescu CM, Dincă L, Cântar I (2018) Which are the most common non-wood forest products in Timis County? Res J Agric Sci 50:51–56
- GLA (2016) Green infrastructure task force report. Greater London Authority, London
- GLAa (2015) The London Plan Chapter Five: London’s Response To Climate Change. Greater London Authority, March, 2015
- Hernea C, Tenche-Constantinescu AM (2013) Variability of groundwater quality parameters from Periurban area of Timisoara (Romania). J Environ Prot Ecol 14:64–70
- Jazbinšek SN, Regina H, Strojin BZ et al (2014) Environmental action Programme 2014–2020. The Department for Environmental Protection, Ljubljana, p 70
- Konijnendijk C, Thorsen B, Tyrvainen L et al (2007) Decision-support for land-use planning through valuation of urban forest benefits. Allgemeine Forst Und Jagdzeitung 178:74
- LES (2018) The London environment strategy. Greater London Authority, London, 442 p
- Loose A, Jankovič M, Jazbinšek Seršen N (2008) Environmental action Programme 2007-2013. City of Ljubljana, The Department for Environmental Protection, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2008, pp. 54
- MEA (2005) Synthesis report, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. Island, Washington, DC., pp.155
- NCC (2015) UK natural capital committee. Clark, K.H.; Nicholas, K.a. introducing urban food forestry: a multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 28:1649–1669
- Šraj M, Lah A, Brilly M (2008) Measurements and analysis of intercepted precipitation of silver birch (Betulapendula Roth.) and scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in urban area. Gozdraski vestnik 66:406–416
- Strojin Božič Z, Regina H, Maslo G, et al (2015) Environment in the City of Ljubljana: European green capital 2016. City of Ljubljana, The Department for Environmental Protection, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 44
- WHO (2016) Global Health Observatory (GHO) data: urban population growth. The World Health Organisation, Geneva
Cited by
Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions
McPhearson, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Ossola, A., Diep, L., Anderson, P. M. L., Blatch, T., Collier, M. J., Cook, E. M., Culwick Fatti, C., Grabowski, Z. J., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2315910121 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiwary, A., Vilhar, U., Zhiyanski, M., Stojanovski, V., & Dinca, L.
- Affiliations
- De Montfort University (GB)
- Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
- Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK)
- Venue
- Urban Ecosystems
- Published
- 2020-02-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 645-657
- ISSN
- 1083-8155 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1642
- OpenAlex
- W3007155527
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- www.springer.com/tdm (vor)
- Locations
- Urban Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
- DiRROS repository (University of Maribor) (publishedVersion)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
- Keywords
- urban commons, nature-based solutions, ecosystem services, urban green infrastructure, woody biomass, non-timber forest products, supporting ecosystem services, building preservation, urban governance, environmental change impacts, expert elicitation, sustainable urban living, European cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of nature-based goods and services provisioning from the urban common: a pan-European perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11252-020-00951-1
- The paper
- Tiwary, A., Vilhar, U., Zhiyanski, M., Stojanovski, V., & Dinca, L. (2020). Management of nature-based goods and services provisioning from the urban common: a pan-European perspective. Urban Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00951-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.