The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Empowering cultural heritage professionals with tools for authoring and deploying personalised visitor experiences
Abstract
This paper presents an authoring environment, which supports cultural heritage professionals in the process of creating and deploying a wide range of different personalised interactive experiences that combine the physical (objects, collection and spaces) and the digital (multimedia content). It is based on a novel flexible formalism that represents the content and the context as independent from one another and allows recombining them in multiple ways thus generating many different interactions from the same elements. The authoring environment was developed in a co-design process with heritage stakeholders and addresses the composition of the content, the definition of the personalisation, and the deployment on a physical configuration of bespoke devices. To simplify the editing while maintaining a powerful representation, the complex creation process is deconstructed into a limited number of elements and phases, including aspects to control personalisation both in content and in interaction. The user interface also includes examples of installations for inspiration and as a means for learning what is possible and how to do it. Throughout the paper, installations in public exhibitions are used to illustrate our points and what our authoring environment can produce. The expressiveness of the formalism and the variety of interactive experiences that could be created was assessed via a range of laboratory tests, while a user-centred evaluation with over 40 cultural heritage professionals assessed whether they feel confident in directly controlling personalisation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to information retrieval
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2715 · Cited by 12,278
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., & Riedl, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '94 · doi:10.1145/192844.192905 · Cited by 5,058
Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/245108.245121 · Cited by 3,772
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., et al. (2009) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1592761.1592779 · Cited by 3,333
Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics
Nielsen, J. (1994) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/191666.191729 · Cited by 1,439
(2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367804787 · Cited by 1,227
Hybrid Web Recommender Systems
Burke, R. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_12 · Cited by 1,173
Simon, N. (2010) · Cited by 901
RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY: A THEORY OF TEXT ORGANIZATION
Mann, W. C. (1987) · Cited by 892
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Balet, O., Koleva, B., Grubert, J., Yi, K.M., Gunia, M., Katsis, A., Castet, J.: Authoring and living next-generation location-based experiences. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality 2015, March 23–27, Arles, France (2015)
- Falk, J.H.: Museums as institutions for personal learning. Daedalus 128(30), 259–275 (1999)
- Katz, S., Kahanov, Y., Kashtan, N., Kuflik, T., Graziola, I., Rocchi, C., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M.: Preparing personalized multimedia presentations for a mobile museum visitors’ guide—a methodological approach. In: Trant, J., Bearman, D. (eds.) Museums and the Web 2006: Proceedings, Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, Published March 1, 2006 at http://www.archimuse.com/mw2006/papers/katz/katz.html (2006). Accessed 8 Mar 2019
- Kuflik, T., Dim, E.: Early detection of Pairs of visitors by using a museum triage. In: Proceedings of MW2013: Museums and the Web 2013, Portland, OR, USA (2013)
- Rowland, C.: Networks: the technology of connectivity. Chapter 3. In: Rowland, C., Goodman, E., Charlier, M., Light, A., Lui, A. (eds.) Designing Connected Products: UX for the Consumer Internet of Things. O’Reilly, Newton (2015b)
Metadata
- Authors
- Not, E., & Petrelli, D.
- Venue
- User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-120
- ISSN
- 0924-1868
- 1573-1391
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 84
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- Funders
- FP7 Information and Communication Technologies (600851)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empowering cultural heritage professionals with tools for authoring and deploying personalised visitor experiences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11257-019-09224-9
- The paper
- Not, E., & Petrelli, D. (2019). Empowering cultural heritage professionals with tools for authoring and deploying personalised visitor experiences. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09224-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.