The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Open accessAbstract
Despite progress in perceptual tasks such as image classification, computers still perform poorly on cognitive tasks such as image description and question answering. Cognition is core to tasks that involve not just recognizing, but reasoning about our visual world. However, models used to tackle the rich content in images for cognitive tasks are still being trained using the same datasets designed for perceptual tasks. To achieve success at cognitive tasks, models need to understand the interactions and relationships between objects in an image. When asked “What vehicle is the person riding?”, computers will need to identify the objects in an image as well as the relationships riding(man, carriage) and pulling(horse, carriage) to answer correctly that “the person is riding a horse-drawn carriage.” In this paper, we present the Visual Genome dataset to enable the modeling of such relationships. We collect dense annotations of objects, attributes, and relationships within each image to learn these models. Specifically, our dataset contains over 108K images where each image has an average of $$35$$ objects, $$26$$ attributes, and $$21$$ pairwise relationships between objects. We canonicalize the objects, attributes, relationships, and noun phrases in region descriptions and questions answer pairs to WordNet synsets. Together, these annotations represent the densest and largest dataset of image descriptions, objects, attributes, relationships, and question answer pairs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most datasets that are currently available for training question generation systems are crowd-sourced [42, 47, 84, 92, 114, 115, 119, 120, 122, 123], which largely impacts the quality of generated questions.”
From Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [122]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“For a few of these applications, some datasets were used like SQuAD, MS-MARCO and the like. Some works curated their own dataset owing to the distinctive application involved [122, 124].”
From Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [122]
In the citing paper
“Also, most works used factoid-based questions but Yes/No [133], MCQ type [124] and reasoning type questions [122] were also generated for some applications.”
From Automatic question generation: a review of methodologies, datasets, evaluation metrics, and applications (2023) · cites this paper as [122]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148 · cited 1×
“To achieve success at cognitive tasks, models need to understand the interactions and relationships between objects in Ranjay Krishna Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA E-mail: ranjaykrishna@cs.stanford.edu Yuke Zhu Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Oliver Groth Dresden University of…”
MethodImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1×
“To achieve success at cognitive tasks, models need to understand the interactions and relationships between objects in Ranjay Krishna Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA E-mail: ranjaykrishna@cs.stanford.edu Yuke Zhu Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Oliver Groth Dresden University of…”
MethodHochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · cited 1×
“We then use the NeuralTalk (Karpathy and Fei-Fei, 2014) model to train a long short-term memory (LSTM) network (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber, 1997) to generate descriptions of regions.”
MethodFaster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Self-citationGoing deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Self-citationRich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hayes, P. J. (1985). The second naive physics manifesto. Theories of the commonsense world (pp. 1–36).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answering
Anderson, P., He, X., Buehler, C., Teney, D., Johnson, M., Gould, S. J., & Zhang, L. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00636 · Cited by 5,416
DOTA: A Large-Scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Images
Xia, G.-S., Bai, X., Ding, J., Zhu, Z., Belongie, S., Luo, J., Datcu, M., Pelillo, M., & Zhang, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00418 · Cited by 3,414
Transformers in Vision: A Survey
Khan, S., Naseer, M., Hayat, M., Zamir, S. W., Khan, F. S., & Shah, M. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3505244 · Cited by 3,595
Places: A 10 Million Image Database for Scene Recognition
Zhou, B., Lapedriza, A., Khosla, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2723009 · Cited by 4,042
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., Bernstein, M. S., & Fei-Fei, L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Yahoo (United States) (US)
- Snap (United States) (US)
- Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Krishna, Ranjay
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Computer Vision
- Published
- 2017-02-06
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-73
- ISSN
- 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1405
- OpenAlex
- W2277195237
- Cited by
- 5,107
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 313 · 2025: 508 · 2024: 690 · 2023: 761 · 2022: 671 · 2021: 738 · 2020: 586 · 2019: 411 · 2018: 230 · 2017: 149
- FWCI
- 156.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Brown Institute for Media Innovation
- Yahoo Inc.
- Stanford University Computer Science Department
- Office of Naval Research
- Toyota USA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- object relations, picture description, question answering, object properties, WordNet synsets, visual cognition, crowdsourced annotation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
