Cited by 36Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsPhosphorus and nutrient management

Effects of biochar and biosolid on adsorption of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in two soils

Rens, H., Bera, T., Alva, A. K.·2018·Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11270-018-3925-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 36

Authors
Rens, H., Bera, T., & Alva, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Bera, T.
Venue
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Published
2018-08
Volume
229
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0049-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2932
OpenAlex
W2886870847
Cited by
36
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Air & Soil Pollution (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
Keywords
biochar, biosolids, nutrient adsorption, nitrogen retention, phosphorus retention, potassium retention, soil amendment, sandy soil, silty clay loam, calcium release, Freundlich isotherm, Langmuir isotherm, nutrient leaching, wastewater treatment residuals, pyrolysis by-products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review