The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water and Wastewaters by Sulfur-Containing Precipitation Agents
Open accessAbstract
Restrictive requirements for maximum concentrations of metals introduced into the environment lead to search for effective methods of their removal. Chemical precipitation using hydroxides or sulfides is one of the most commonly used methods for removing metals from water and wastewater. The process is simple and inexpensive. However, during metal hydroxide precipitation, large amounts of solids are formed. As a result, metal hydroxide is getting amphoteric and it can go back into the solution. On the other hand, use of sulfides is characterized by lower solubility compared with that of metal hydroxides, so a higher degree of metal reduction can be achieved in a shorter time. Disadvantages of that process are very low solubility of metal sulfides, highly sensitive process to the dosing of the precipitation agent, and the risks of emission of toxic hydrogen sulfide. All these restrictions forced to search for new and effective precipitants. Potassium/sodium thiocarbonate (STC) and 2,4,6-trimercaptotiazine (TMT) are widely used. Dithiocarbamate (DTC) compounds are also used, e.g., sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate (SDTC), and ligands for permanent metal binding, e.g., 1,3-benzenediamidoethanethiol (BDETH 2), 2,6-pyridinediamidoethanethiol (PyDET), a pyridine-based thiol ligand (DTPY) or ligands with open chains containing many sulfur atoms, using of a tetrahedral bonding arrangement around a central metal atom. The possibility of improving the efficiency of metal precipitation is obtained by using a higher dose of precipitating agent. However, toxic byproducts are often produced. It is required that the precipitation agents not only effectively remove metal ions from the solution but also effectively bind with dyes or metal complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pearson, R. G. (1963) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00905a001 · Cited by 10,475
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater
Barakat, M. A. (2011) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019 · Cited by 3,094
Detection and removal of heavy metal ions: a review
Malik, L. A., Bashir, A., Qureashi, A., & Pandith, A. H. (2019) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-019-00891-z · Cited by 904
Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands: A critical review
Sheoran, A. S., & Sheoran, V. (2006) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2005.08.006 · Cited by 829
Chemical precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage
Matlock, M. M., Howerton, B. S., & Atwood, D. A. (2002) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00149-5 · Cited by 747
Review of metal sulphide precipitation
Lewis, A. E. (2010) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.06.010 · Cited by 709
Modified activated carbon for the removal of copper, zinc, chromium and cyanide from wastewater
Monser, L., & Adhoum, N. (2002) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/s1383-5866(01)00155-1 · Cited by 644
Nanomaterials for removal of toxic elements from water
Lu, F., & Astruc, D. (2018) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.003 · Cited by 446
Acid Mine Drainage Control and Treatment
Skousen, J. G., Sexstone, A., & Ziemkiewicz, P. F. (2000) · Agronomy Monographs · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr41.c6 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Hama Aziz, K. H., Mustafa, F. S., Omer, K. M., Hama, S., Hamarawf, R. F., & Rahman, K. O. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d3ra00723e · Cited by 982
Chan, S. S., Khoo, K. S., Chew, K. W., Ling, T. C., & Show, P. L. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126159 · Cited by 422
Industrial wastewater treatment: Current trends, bottlenecks, and best practices
Dutta, D., Arya, S., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131245 · Cited by 398
A review on magnetic sensors for monitoring of hazardous pollutants in water resources
Hojjati-Najafabadi, A., Mansoorianfar, M., Liang, T., Shahin, K., & Karimi-Maleh, H. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153844 · Cited by 367
RetractedLin, G., Zeng, B., Li, J., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Hu, T., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.141710 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Pohl, A.
- Venue
- Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
- Published
- 2020-09-28
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0049-6979 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2932
- OpenAlex
- W3088264701
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 15.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water and Wastewaters by Sulfur-Containing Precipitation Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11270-020-04863-w
- The paper
- Pohl, A. (2020). Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water and Wastewaters by Sulfur-Containing Precipitation Agents. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04863-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.