Cited by 59Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant and fungal interactionsPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis

Dual symbiosis between Piriformospora indica and Azotobacter chroococcum enhances the artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L.

Arora, Monika, Saxena, Parul, Choudhary, Devendra Kumar, Abdin, Malik Zainul, Varma, Ajit·2016·World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

At present, Artemisia annua L. is the major source of artemisinin production. To control the outbreaks of malaria, artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) are recommended, and hence an ample amount of artemisinin is required for ACTs manufacture to save millions of lives. The low yield of this antimalarial drug in A. annua L. plants (0.01-1.1%) ensues its short supply and high cost, thus making it a topic of scrutiny worldwide. In this study, the effects of root endophyte, Piriformospora indica strain DSM 11827 and nitrogen fixing bacterium, Azotobacter chroococcum strain W-5, either singly and/or in combination for artemisinin production in A. annua L. plants have been studied under poly house conditions. The plant growth was monitored by measuring parameters like height of plant, total dry weight and leaf yield with an increase of 63.51, 52.61 and 79.70% respectively, for treatment with dual biological consortium, as compared to that of control plants. This significant improvement in biomass was associated with higher total chlorophyll content (59.29%) and enhanced nutrition (especially nitrogen and phosphorus, 55.75 and 86.21% respectively). The concentration of artemisinin along with expression patterns of artemisinin biosynthesis genes were appreciably higher in dual treatment, which showed positive correlation. The study suggested the potential use of the consortium P. indica strain DSM 11827 and A. chroococcum strain W-5 in A. annua L. plants for increased overall productivity and sustainable agriculture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11274-015-1972-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 59

Authors
Arora, M., Saxena, P., Choudhary, D. K., Abdin, M. Z., & Varma, A.
Affiliations
Amity University (IN)
Corresponding author
Varma, Ajit
Venue
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2016-01-08
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
19-19
ISSN
  • 0959-3993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0972
OpenAlex
W2293522368
Cited by
59
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Keywords
Piriformospora indica, Azotobacter chroococcum, Artemisia annua, artemisinin biosynthesis, root endophytes, nitrogen fixation, artemisinin yield, plant growth promotion, chlorophyll content, plant nutrition
MeSH terms
Azotobacter, Basidiomycota, Chlorophyll, Nitrogen, Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus, RNA, Symbiosis, Biomass, Artemisia annua, Artemisinins, Biosynthetic Pathways, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review