Dual symbiosis between Piriformospora indica and Azotobacter chroococcum enhances the artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L.
Abstract
At present, Artemisia annua L. is the major source of artemisinin production. To control the outbreaks of malaria, artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) are recommended, and hence an ample amount of artemisinin is required for ACTs manufacture to save millions of lives. The low yield of this antimalarial drug in A. annua L. plants (0.01-1.1%) ensues its short supply and high cost, thus making it a topic of scrutiny worldwide. In this study, the effects of root endophyte, Piriformospora indica strain DSM 11827 and nitrogen fixing bacterium, Azotobacter chroococcum strain W-5, either singly and/or in combination for artemisinin production in A. annua L. plants have been studied under poly house conditions. The plant growth was monitored by measuring parameters like height of plant, total dry weight and leaf yield with an increase of 63.51, 52.61 and 79.70% respectively, for treatment with dual biological consortium, as compared to that of control plants. This significant improvement in biomass was associated with higher total chlorophyll content (59.29%) and enhanced nutrition (especially nitrogen and phosphorus, 55.75 and 86.21% respectively). The concentration of artemisinin along with expression patterns of artemisinin biosynthesis genes were appreciably higher in dual treatment, which showed positive correlation. The study suggested the potential use of the consortium P. indica strain DSM 11827 and A. chroococcum strain W-5 in A. annua L. plants for increased overall productivity and sustainable agriculture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual treatment of A. annua with P. indica or A. chroococcum also resulted in artemisinin enhancement to about the same extent.
“The individual treatment of A. annua with P. indica or A. chroococcum also resulted in artemisinin enhancement to about the same extent (Arora et al. 2016).”
From Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: a review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches (2021) · cites this paper as Arora et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Arora, M., Saxena, P., Choudhary, D. K., Abdin, M. Z., & Varma, A.
- Affiliations
- Amity University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Varma, Ajit
- Venue
- World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2016-01-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 19-19
- ISSN
- 0959-3993 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0972
- OpenAlex
- W2293522368
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and fungal interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
- Keywords
- Piriformospora indica, Azotobacter chroococcum, Artemisia annua, artemisinin biosynthesis, root endophytes, nitrogen fixation, artemisinin yield, plant growth promotion, chlorophyll content, plant nutrition
- MeSH terms
- Azotobacter, Basidiomycota, Chlorophyll, Nitrogen, Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus, RNA, Symbiosis, Biomass, Artemisia annua, Artemisinins, Biosynthetic Pathways, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review