Cited by 69IoT Networks and ProtocolsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of LPWAN Technologies: Cost Structure and Scalability

Open access
Hossain, Mohammad Istiak, Markendahl, Jan I.·2021·Wireless Personal Communications

Abstract

Small-scale commercial rollouts of Cellular-IoT (C-IoT) networks have started globally since last year. However, among the plethora of low power wide area network (LPWAN) technologies, the cost-effectiveness of C-IoT is not certain for IoT service providers, small and greenfield operators. Today, there is no known public framework for the feasibility analysis of IoT communication technologies. Hence, this paper first presents a generic framework to assess the cost structure of cellular and non-cellular LPWAN technologies. Then, we applied the framework in eight deployment scenarios to analyze the prospect of LPWAN technologies like Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, LTE-M, and EC-GSM. We consider the inter-technology interference impact on LoRaWAN and Sigfox scalability. Our results validate that a large rollout with a single technology is not cost-efficient. Also, our analysis suggests the rollout possibility of an IoT communication Technology may not be linear to cost-efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11277-021-08664-0

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Porter, M. E., & Advantage, C. (1985). Creating and sustaining superior performance. Competitive Advantage, 167, 167–206.
  2. Sigfox. (2017). Sigfox technical overview.https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hossain, M. I., & Markendahl, J. I.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Hossain, Mohammad Istiak
Venue
Wireless Personal Communications
Published
2021-07-07
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
887-903
ISSN
  • 0929-6212 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-834X
OpenAlex
W3017357076
Cited by
69
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wireless Personal Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Telecommunications Policy
Funders
Royal Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
low-power wide-area networks, cellular IoT, cost structure, scalability, Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, LTE-M, network deployment, cost efficiency, feasibility study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review